Thursday, September 20th | 11 Tishri 5779

Subscribe
March 19, 2018 3:16 pm

Reborn Israel Has Settled the ‘Jewish Question’

avatar by Daniel Krygier

Email a copy of "Reborn Israel Has Settled the ‘Jewish Question’" to a friend

The Western Wall and Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The “Jewish Question” was an intense debate during the 19th and 20th centuries — dealing with the status and treatment of Jews in European societies.

This “question” was part of a wider discourse that focused on civic and national rights of minorities in emerging nation states. European extreme nationalists argued that Jews constituted an alien people that had no place in Europe. By contrast, liberals often supported equal civic rights for Jewish citizens. However, in many cases, the price for civic equality was the abandonment of Jewish national identity and assimilation into European societies.

The Jewish people themselves were divided between Western European Jews, who advocated assimilation, and the more numerous Eastern European Jewish Zionists, who worked for the return of the Jewish people to its ancestral homeland.

Seven decades after the Holocaust and the re-establishment of the Jewish homeland, Israel, the “Jewish Question” remains unsettled among many gentiles.

Related coverage

September 20, 2018 2:46 pm
0

New Eichmann Film Puts the Lie to Hannah Arendt’s ‘Banality of Evil’

One of the most notorious lines -- and lies -- that grew out of the trial of Adolph Eichmann for...

In the past, Jews were mainly threatened by the political Right. Today, in my view, the main threat comes from the political Left and its Islamist allies. Yesterday’s liberals advocated civic equality for fellow Jewish citizens. Today, many “liberals” increasingly deny equal national rights for the Jewish people in Israel.

The Holocaust made it politically incorrect to publically embrace antisemitism in Western democracies. However, Jew-hatred — termed “the longest hatred” by the late Israeli scholar Robert Wistrich – is far from gone in Western societies. Instead of hating Jews as individuals, 20th and 21st century antisemites mainly channel their hatred against the collective Jew among the nations, Israel.

In the 19th century, the German agitator Wilhelm Marr coined the term antisemitism in order to make Jew-hatred appear more scientific and “legitimate.” As this term has become severely tainted since the Holocaust, 21st century Jew-haters prefer to call themselves anti-Zionists. We live in an era where racism is officially unacceptable. Anti-Zionists therefore claim to oppose Israel’s existence in the name of “human rights” and “anti-racism.”

Many of Israel’s foes insist that it is not possible to criticize the Jewish state without being accused of antisemitism. This claim is not only patently false, but also absurd given the fact that no other country in the world is subjected to more obsessive condemnations at the UN and other international forums than the Jewish state. Opposition to Israel’s existence has deliberately been conflated with what is vaguely described as “criticism.”

The former Swedish liberal leader Per Ahlmark noted that genuine criticism of Israel seeks to improve Israeli society, while anti-Zionism seeks Israel’s destruction. The former focuses on specific Israeli policies, while the latter rejects the very idea that the Jewish people is entitled to a homeland.

Israel’s ideological enemies also conveniently ignore the fact that the Jewish state is a thriving democracy with a strong tradition of self-criticism. Few serious pundits would equate opposition to Britain’s existence with “criticism” of specific British policies. People who opposed British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan did not claim that Britain is “evil” and must be destroyed.

But antisemitism has displayed a remarkable ability to adapt regardless of time and place. The common denominator has always been demonization and double standards against Jews as individuals or as a nation.

Like Islamists, some leftists oppose Israel’s existence within any borders. However, their goals differ. The Islamic opposition to a Jewish state is rooted in the supremacist ideology that Jews can only exist as dhimmis, submissive objects under Islamic rule. By contrast, leftists oppose nationalism in general and Jewish nationalism in particular. In my view, the international Left rightly sees Israel as the world’s most powerful symbol of Jewish identity.

As in the past, Jewish individuals who have a troublesome relationship with their identity have joined the enemies of the Jewish people. Anti-Israel extremists like Noam Chomsky and Ilan Pappé are modern incarnations of Marxists like Rosa Luxemburg, who fight their inner demons by advocating the disappearance of the Jewish people and the Jewish nation-state Israel.

The “Jewish Question” has been settled for the vast majority of world Jewry. Diaspora Jews who embrace assimilation can freely do so in Western societies, while Jews who seek to preserve their Jewish identity increasingly gravitate towards Israel. The reborn, thriving, and powerful Jewish state is today home to the world’s largest Jewish population. For the first time in over 2,000 years, the Jewish people in Israel is in the driver’s seat of its own destiny and has the capability to defend itself against anti-Jewish bigotry.

Daniel Krygier is a writer and a political analyst. 

BESA Center Perspectives Papers, such as this one, are published through the generosity of the Greg Rosshandler Family.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com