The New Israel Fund (NIF) is ecstatic over its victory dismantling the Israeli government’s plan to deport illegal migrants from Africa back to friendly, third-party African countries. As the self-described “real opposition” in Israel, the NIF believes it has accomplished a major policy goal.

The NIF is indeed on a roll. Their grantees have been advocating against the self-defense tactics of the IDF at the Gaza border and are also trying to stop the transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem.

There’s just one problem: The NIF is not an Israeli organization. It’s American. The NIF has no seats in the Knesset, nor does it send its children to the Israeli army. If there is conflict in Israel, there is no need for them to find shelter in a safe room, because they are safely ensconced in America.

How are Israelis supposed to react to this state of affairs? Perhaps a hint can be found in how Americans have reacted to the prospect that Russians interfered with the US election in 2016. They were furious that the internal affairs of their country might have been influenced by foreigners.

Americans were rightly concerned that their sovereignty was being compromised by non-Americans who had their own agenda. They were being manipulated by outsiders who might claim they were acting for the benefit of Americans, but were actually pursuing their own agenda.

The real question then is why should Israelis be any different from Americans? Why shouldn’t we be resentful about the incursion into our democracy by people who incessantly proclaim that they are acting in the name of democracy, yet completely disregard ours?

Our government is duly elected by the citizens of Israel. It reflects the will of the people, and indeed — according to various opinion polls — the government’s policy towards migrants was supported by a significant majority of the citizens of Israel.

None of this seems to matter to the New Israel Fund. This is reminiscent of the politician who, when hearing that he had lost his election and the “people” had “spoken,” said that what was needed was a new “people.”

There are two things that truly distinguish the New Israel Fund — lots of money and overbearing arrogance. Combining the two, the result is a “my way or else” approach to Israel, an insistence that Israel’s many sins be corrected according to the dictates of… guess who.

Lots of money can buy you a lot of access and even influence. It cannot, however, change the reality that what is being attempted is an end run around Israel’s own sovereignty, its own democracy, and our own destiny.

I often hear fellow olim (new immigrants to Israel) saying, “I didn’t make aliyah so that … (fill in the grievance).” I understand the sentiment. I didn’t make aliyah to have my future controlled by people who didn’t and wouldn’t make aliyah, but nevertheless feel entitled to tell me how to live my life.

Something is rotten in Israel. We should not be delegating our destiny to the New Israel Fund.

Mr Altabef is Chairman of the Board of Im Tirtzu and a director of the Israel Independence Fund. He can be reached at dougaltabef@gmail.com.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.