Tuesday, November 30th | 27 Kislev 5782

June 27, 2018 9:07 am

US Islamists Ignore Erdogan’s Authoritarianism, Celebrate Win

avatar by Steven Emerson


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan greets his supporters from the balcony of his ruling AK Party headquarters in Ankara, Turkey, June 25, 2018. Photo: Kayhan Ozer/Presidential Palace/Handout via REUTERS.

Unbelievably, a number of American Islamists are hailing Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s election Monday to a new five-year term as a win for democracy.

In truth, the autocratic leader put the inherent advantages of incumbency on steroids, dominating media coverage, keeping opponents in jail, and generating what Amnesty International describes as a “climate of fear.”

The Committee to Protect Journalists named Erdogan’s Turkey “the worst jailer of journalists in 2017.” An estimated 120 journalists there have been imprisoned on terrorism charges since a failed coup in 2016. Even Amnesty International’s Turkey director Taner Kılıç has spent the past year behind bars. Dozens more news outlets have been shut down or taken over by elements sympathetic to the government.

But American Islamists, who eagerly express concern for civil rights in the United States, saw only cause for celebration in Turkey.

Related coverage

November 30, 2021 11:50 am

The University of Toronto’s Jewish Problem

As if to confirm the depth of its anti-Israel animus, the Student Union of the University of Toronto at Scarborough...

“Blessings to Turkey. Blessings to us all,” Salah Sarsour, an American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) national board member, wrote in an Arabic Facebook post. “Oh God, as we were made joyful by Erdogan’s win, this Umma [Muslim nation] was made joyful by its choice, and not its lackeys, gaining power.”

AMP is a stridently anti-Israel organization that has expressed support for Hamas. Erdogan also has been a strong Hamas supporter, calling it a national liberation movement and rejecting its designation as a terrorist group. As a result, American Islamists stood by Erdogan during the failed 2016 coup and looked the other way last year when Erdogan’s bodyguards attacked peaceful protesters in Washington.

Another AMP board member, Osama Abuirshaid, also saw Turkey as the victim of international conspiracy.

“Congratulations to Turkey for its free will, and no consolation to the Jewish and Arab Zionists, as well as to the West which has not been cleansed of its imperialism,” he wrote in an Arabic Twitter post. “We all know that targeting #Turkey and conspiracies against it will multiply, but the Turkish people have proved every time that they are eager for their homeland. We ask Allah to allow Turkey to pass this stage in peace and to remain an asset to this Umma.”

Erdogan’s opponents received a mocking Twitter post from Hussam Ayloush, director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) Los Angeles office. Ayloush has refused to even answer whether Hamas is a terrorist group and has repeatedly equated the Israeli army to ISIS terrorists.

The world rejoiced, he claimed, after Erdogan’s autocratic win, while “Condolences services [will] be held in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, and Israel.”

Ayloush’s boss, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, has traveled repeatedly to Turkey and praised its “democracy and the rule of law” in 2016.

Erdogan, who first came to power as prime minister in 2003, has “achieved near-absolute power,” The Washington Post editorialized. The prime minister’s office is now being abolished and Erdogan could easily rule Turkey for another decade.

“What authoritarians have figured out is not to cancel elections, as old-fashioned dictators used to do, or fake them entirely, but rather to hold the vote and control the circumstances so tightly that no one else can win,” the editorial said. “The latest Turkish campaign was neither free nor fair.”

Erdogan received as much as 10 times more news media coverage than his main opponent during the campaign. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) found that opposition parties were severely disadvantaged by Erdogan’s hold over media outlets, and restrictions on free speech and assembly were key factors in the vote.

“Erdogan ‘won’ reelection in Turkey this weekend only by decimating the opposition through arrests, violence, and squashing freedom of the press,” wrote Congressman Adam Schiff. “Turkey’s descent into autocracy is another reminder that democracy is under assault worldwide. DO NOT CONGRATULATE.”

Despite his advantages, Erdogan somehow was considered an underdog by Monzer Taleb, a Kansas-based imam who once performed with a pro-Hamas singing troupe.

“Turkey have won,” he wrote on Twitter, “In spite of economic conspiracy. … In spite of election conspiracy [sic]. In spite of hate from so called Muslim neighbors.”

Erdogan’s reign has been dominated by gradual moves away from the secular democratic reforms instituted by the country’s modern founder Kamal Ataturk. Instead, religious law has taken root in education, the courts, and the Turkish media.

That may provide context for the praise coming this week from conservative Houston-based cleric Yasir Qadhi. While Erdogan apparently hasn’t gone far enough, Qadhi said that it was “undeniable that under his leadership, the country overall has taken a turn for the better from the perspective of the freedom to practice religion, and also the ‘spirit’ of being a Muslim. Compare and contrast Turkey from two decades ago — a country that was known for its militant, secularist anti-Islamic regime, and mocked and expelled a member of parliament who dared to wear the hijab — to the Turkey of today, and the difference is palpable.”

Not a breath of concern about any of Erdogan’s restrictions on free expression and the ability to dissent — nor his rampant abuses of power — was mentioned in the congratulatory posts. Their “guy” won. That’s all that matters.

Steven Emerson is considered one of the leading authorities on Islamic extremist networks, financing and operations. He serves as the Executive Director of The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.