Friday, November 16th | 8 Kislev 5779

Subscribe
July 2, 2018 11:54 am

The Media Continues to Lie About Israeli Actions in Gaza

avatar by Adam Levick

Email a copy of "The Media Continues to Lie About Israeli Actions in Gaza" to a friend

Palestinians prepare to fly a kite loaded with flammable material, near the Israel-Gaza border, June 4, 2018. Photo: Reuters / Ibraheem Abu Mustafa.

A June 28 article at The Times of London once again demonstrates the media’s frequent failure to challenge incendiary and unsubstantiated accusations against Israel by Palestinians or pro-Palestinian campaigners.

The article, “Campaigners call for Eurovision boycott” — written by the paper’s Ireland Arts Correspondent — included a quote by Irish senator David Norris charging that the IDF used expanding bullets (aka “Dumb-dumb bullets”) when firing at “children” during Gaza border riots.

Here’s our tweet to the journalist:

There’s so much malevolence in this single sentence — the least of which is the smear that the IDF cruelly targeted Palestinian children in its alleged use of this internationally outlawed ammunition.

Moreover, there’s absolutely no evidence by any reputable source that Israel used such bullets. The only source appears to be one Gaza physician, Dr. Ayman Sahbani, who was treating Palestinians shot during the riots and claimed, whilst commenting on the severity of bullet wounds he’s treated, that “a noticeable number of the gunshot injuries comprise an exit point larger than the entry point, suggesting explosive bullets.”

However, back in April, after communication with CAMERA, who cited the expertise of ballistic experts and doctors regarding the injuries described by the doctor, The Associated Press (AP) revised a story that initially used the quote by Dr. Sahbani. The new language notes that such wounds are actually quite consistent with normal rifle fire. CAMERA also prompted Haaretz and The Times of Israel to correct their copy of the AP story.

Note also that even the fringes of the anti-Israel biosphere (e.g., Richard Silverstein) eventually walked back the initial claim that Israel had used such ammunition.

We lodged an official complaint with Times of London editors, who refused to remove the quote but did agree to add an additional sentence:

Though we’re pleased that editors added Israel’s denial, it’s still appalling that the baseless smear remained in the article.

The writer covers the British media for CAMERA, the 65,000-member, Boston-based Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com