Thursday, November 15th | 7 Kislev 5779

Subscribe
July 4, 2018 10:36 am

Human Rights Watch Lies About Israel — Again

avatar by Elder of Ziyon

Email a copy of "Human Rights Watch Lies About Israel — Again" to a friend

The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. Photo: UN.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) executive director Sarah Leah Whitson tweeted the following, claiming that Israel never allows universal human rights reviews and is a “rogue state.”

There’s only one problem: Israel did participate in the triennial universal periodic review. It boycotted the entire UN Human Rights Council session in June, but it did cooperate with the Council’s review itself, as Al Jazeera reported in January:

In her opening remarks, Aviva Raz Shechter, Israeli ambassador to the UN in Geneva, laid out bluntly how Israel was going to receive the recommendations of fellow members.

“The continuous discrimination against Israel in the HRC and the unparalleled number of one-sided biased and political resolutions adopted regularly by the automatic majority of its members testify not only to the unfair treatment of Israel but also to the deficiencies of the council itself and its agenda,” she said.

Shechter said Israel would submit to the review process despite what she called the HRC’s bias, and demanded its overhaul.

Shechter, the Israeli ambassador, said it was deplorable that UN representatives would use the UPR session as what she called a platform to politicise the human rights discourse.

“It is a cynical and hypocritical attitude meant to distort the reality,” she said, adding however that Israel would continue to cooperate with the HRC and take “seriously” the recommendations made at Tuesday’s session.

There is no rule that says a country must attend the meeting where the report is released. HRW is falsely claiming that a boycott of the meeting shows that Israel is a “rogue state” that refuses “any” review of its conduct. This is obviously a lie.

Israel is boycotting the entire week’s UNHRC session — not just the meeting where the hugely biased review was released — because of its clear and obvious bias. The January session showed just how much the UNHRC is anti-Israel, not only in its specifically anti-Israel agenda item 7, but altogether.

As far as I know, the only other country that HRW has ever referred to in an unqualified fashion as a “rogue state” was Burma in 2008 — which shows that HRW is fully on board with the anti-Israel bias of the UNHRC.

Elder of Ziyon has been blogging about Israel and the Arab world for a really long time now. He also controls the world, but deep down you already knew that.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com