Wednesday, September 28th | 3 Tishri 5783

October 9, 2018 8:50 am

Leading American BDS Group’s Conference Minimizes Non-Violence

avatar by Steven Emerson


Signs at a pro-BDS protest in New York following the US decision to move its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Photo: Reuters/Carlo Allegri.

When Islamists and other anti-Israel groups gather, they’ve learned to use euphemisms to take the edge off some of their more extreme views. They don’t call for Israel’s annihilation like Iran’s leaders do, they just lock on to a “right of return” demand that would wipe out the Jewish state demographically .

And they use slogans such as, “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free,” which geographically leaves no room for Israel.

The usual demonization of Israel was present two weeks ago in St. Paul, Minnesota, when the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR), an umbrella group leading the BDS push to isolate and weaken Israel through boycotts and divestment drives, held a major conference. It is common for Islamists and pro-Palestinian activists to sanitize terrorist attacks as “legitimate resistance” at such events, but three USCPR speakers came right out and made a case for violence, going much further than “boycotts and divestment.”

Two are university professors, including one who is a frequent CNN pundit. One made a point of praising a terrorist murderer. The other dismissed non-violent protest as a path for Palestinians to follow by saying “this nonviolent thing” can be too limiting, and raised the question of “what legitimate resistance looks like.”

Those words were from Marc Lamont Hill, a Temple University professor, BET host, and CNN contributor, who warned his audience against adopting “a civil rights tradition which romanticizes non-violence. That’s the challenge … that’s the challenge. It romanticizes non-violence, but how can you romanticize non-violence when you have a state that is at all moments waging war against you, against your bodies, poisoning your water, limiting your access to water, locking up your children, killing you. We can’t romanticize resistance.”

That’s a gross misrepresentation of the conflict, ignoring the role that Palestinian incitement and an intra-Palestinian political struggle plays in the dispute.

But even if it were true, somehow Gandhi prevailed with non-violence. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his followers — men, women, and children — endured murders, terrorist attacks, brutal beatings, police dogs, and fire hoses. But by steadfastly holding to the “romanticized” principle of non-violence, they ended school segregation and secured passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

“The aftermath of nonviolence is the creation of the beloved community,” King said often, “while the aftermath of the violence is tragic bitterness.”

For Palestinian advocates, “nonviolent protest” includes throwing grenades and other explosives, and using kites to spark massive wildfires, all under the direction of Hamas — the terrorist organization that runs Gaza.

But as Hill said, “We have allowed this non-violent thing to become so normative that we’re undermining our own ability to resist in real robust ways.”

The USCPR audience embraced his comments.

The USCPR is an umbrella organization that is considered a leader in the BDS movement. Member organizations include anti-Israel groups Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), and Code Pink.

In June, Tablet magazine reported that USCPR “is the fiscal sponsor of a group called the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), the main West Bank and Gaza-based cohort advocating for sanctions against Israel.”

Like USCPR, BNC is a coalition. One of its members, the Council of National and Islamic Forces in Palestine, includes five Palestinian terrorist groups, including Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, two Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine wings, and the Palestine Liberation Front.

Palestinian writer Miriam Barghouti reminded the USCPR conference that “Palestine from the river to the sea is our demand.” And like Hill, she tried to cast Palestinian violence as somehow rare, but sometimes good.

The audio can be heard at the Investigative Project on Terrorism website.

“For instance, when the knife attacks were happening in Palestine a few years ago — 2015? 2015. You know, Palestinian youth were out in the streets carrying out knife attacks and I’d hear Palestinians and Palestinian representation scurrying away from this topic,” she said. “No one really wanted to talk about it because it shatters the image of the approachable non-violent Palestinian that’s standing bare-chested in front of Israeli soldiers that are carrying arms. And suddenly we were confronted with anger and that made us uncomfortable. And it’s this discomfort with anger, this discomfort with violence that has created a huge gap when we speak about Palestinian resistance.”

But the Palestinian Authority doesn’t name community centers and schools for heroes of non-violence. It does, however, name public places for terrorists who kill Israeli civilians. It pays the families of dead and imprisoned terrorists on a sliding scale. And Hamas officials routinely make it clear that their goal is nothing short of Israel’s annihilation.

The USCPR conference featured no talk about peaceful negotiations to end the conflict, and no talk about pressuring Hamas to renounce terror and devote its resources to improving the quality of life for Palestinians in Gaza. But it did feature praise for a Jew killer.

George Mason University Assistant Professor Noura Erakat helped open the conference by hailing Rasmieh Odeh, who helped blow up a Jerusalem grocery store in 1969, killing two Israeli college students. Odeh is not a terrorist, Erakat said, but “our dear sister [and] freedom fighter.”

President Trump, Erakat said, “for better or for worse has further entrenched the question of Palestine into a progressive-left movement driven by intersectional analysis. This trend is best exemplified by the case of our dear sister, freedom fighter Rasmieh Odeh [audience applauds], who I had the recent pleasure of being with in Amman, who is shining everywhere she goes, who teaches us what survival and thriving looks like. So, if we all just collectively send out energies to Rasmieh. Rasmieh is a freedom fighter, a former political prisoner.”

In fact, Odeh’s prosecution for naturalization fraud took place before Trump took office. After an appeal overturned her conviction, Odeh pleaded guilty in April 2017 and was deported to Jordan. In her signed plea agreement, she admitted lying about being arrested and convicted in the Jerusalem bombing.

In another conference session, the audience was instructed what to do if anyone asks whether they support Hamas. The answer? Evade the question — and say you support Palestinians living in Gaza. When an unidentified audience member described this strategy, Tanya Keilani from the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) endorsed it wholeheartedly.

That also brings us to what you were saying, which is how do I deal with the Hamas question, right? [Unidentified name] did so well. And again to bring it back to the root cause, reminding people of the root cause is super important, right? Also noting that throughout history people have responded to oppression in various ways, right? But we all know that nothing justifies this form of oppression, right? So bringing it back to the root cause, redirecting. No one needs to know the details of the Hamas charter. There, you know, what date this happened, what meeting or negotiation or whatever. It’s too much information, so it’s usually a diversion tactic.

The USCPR conference comes weeks after the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) held a convention featuring an admonition not to “humanize” Israelis, a denial of Palestinian radicalism and incitement, and antisemitic conspiracy theories.

And like ISNA, the USCPR conference made it clear that the goal is not peace with Israel, but war and destruction.

Steven Emerson is considered one of the leading authorities on Islamic extremist networks, financing, and operations. He serves as the Executive Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism, a non-profit organization that is one of the world’s largest storehouses of archival data and intelligence on Islamic and Middle Eastern terrorist groups.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.