JNS.org – The terror organization Hezbollah has built tunnels from Lebanese territory into northern Israel; their intention was infiltration. It turns out, however, that IDF intelligence had been tracking them. Last week, Israel began to destroy them. Israel’s Operation Northern Shield will likely not cause a major cross-border war, because Iran is not prepared to lose the assets it has placed there to the Israeli Air Force.

What appears less understood is how the United States — by its financial and training support of the government of Lebanon and the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) — is providing resources that allow Hezbollah to pursue its deadly machinations on the border. Not deliberately, of course, and not directly. The Trump administration strongly supported Israel’s decision to strike Hezbollah. Even the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson said in a press briefing, “We do not question Israel’s right to ensure its national security, including by preventing anyone from entering the country.”

Where this becomes hazy is when both the United States and Russia — and the permanent members of the UN Security Council — try to make a distinction between Hezbollah the terror organization and Hezbollah the government of Lebanon. The Russian spokesperson said, “We hope that no actions taken … will be in conflict with UN Security Council Resolution 1701,” and that Moscow hopes the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) would “fulfill its monitoring mission and will not allow any violations.” That last bit was public window-dressing. Lebanon is in well-known violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701’s 2006 demand that UNIFIL ensure:

• [the] establishment between the (UN demarcated) Blue Line and the Litani River an area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons other than those of the Government of Lebanon and of UNIFIL deployed in this area;
• disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon, so that … there will be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than that of the Lebanese State.

Hezbollah’s 100,000-plus rockets and missiles in southern Lebanon make a mockery of the resolution, because the idea that the “Lebanese State” is separate from Hezbollah is a fiction.

If Lebanon was a person, it would be diagnosed with multiple personality disorder; it contains Christian, Shiite Muslim, Sunni Muslim, and Druze areas, with varying militias and different goals and alliances. But Lebanon is a sort-of-functional parliamentary democracy, which means, for purposes of discussion, the government is responsible for what happens within its borders. Today, the government is led by Hezbollah. In the parliament, Hezbollah and the Shiite parties aligned with it hold more than half the seats; the Christian party of Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun is aligned with Hezbollah as well.

There is no separation between the “Lebanese State” and Hezbollah.

The United States has, for more than a decade, been responsive to the face that Lebanon shows it — and seems unaware, unconcerned, or unwilling to deal with the other face.

The US government has provided military training and weapons — plus $1.5 billion in aid — to the government of Lebanon since 2006, which marked the end of the war that Hezbollah instigated against Israel. The goal of this aid was to encourage Beirut to abide by the terms of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, and to allow the LAF to operate in the south and on the border with Israel as a closer-to-neutral force.

A Pentagon spokesperson told Reuters in May:

The United States remains committed to supporting Lebanon’s sovereignty, stability, security, and its state institutions, to include the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) as the professional, multi-confessional and sole legitimate armed forces of the Lebanese state.

She noted that the United States considers the LAF “the sole legitimate defender of Lebanon’s sovereignty.”

But in the 12 years since the 2006 war, UNIFIL and the LAF have failed to establish or defend Lebanese sovereignty separate from Hezbollah. The United States pays for the fiction that the Hezbollah government in Beirut will order the LAF to fight the Hezbollah army in the south.

Israel has no territorial aspirations in Lebanon. But the Trump administration’s current policy helps Hezbollah threaten it in a way that can easily lead to more and bigger wars.

Shoshana Bryen is a specialist in US defense policy and Middle East affairs.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.