Saturday, October 16th | 10 Heshvan 5782

March 27, 2019 10:45 am

Linda Sarsour’s NYU Makeover

avatar by Steven Emerson


Linda Sarsour, left, and Tamika Mallory during the Third Annual Women’s March in Washington, D.C., Jan. 19, 2019. Photo: Reuters / Joshua Roberts.

She certainly looked like Linda Sarsour, the flame-throwing anti-Israel political activist. And the speaker had Sarsour’s voice. But the woman who spoke on Monday night at New York University’s Skirball Center for the Performing Arts seemed entirely unfamiliar with Sarsour’s own views.

Arguing that “unity is not uniformity,” Sarsour said that she’s “cool with” people who don’t share her views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict if she can work with them on other issues.

“It doesn’t matter to me who you are,” she said. “Come to the aid of people who are the most broken in our country, and that’s the thing that I never just understood. I never went to a movement and asked people to fill out a form and say, ‘Please tell me all your political views.’ I mean, that’s not how it works.”

But that’s exactly what she did.

Related coverage

October 15, 2021 10:30 am

Is the US Withdrawal From the Middle East a Good Thing?

It may not have been planned or coordinated, but efforts by Middle Eastern states to dial down tensions in the...

Less than three years ago, Sarsour — who believes “nothing is creepier than Zionism” — told an American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) conference that the fight against what she called a “Muslim registry” didn’t have room for people who don’t support anti-Israel campaigns.

Here’s what she said:

“We have limits to the type of friendships that we’re looking for right now,” and those limits involve people who “have been steadfast, courageous, have been standing up and protecting their own communities, those who have taken the risk to stand up and say — we are with the Palestinian people, we unequivocally support BDS [boycotting, divesting from, and sanctioning Israel] when it comes to Palestinian human rights and have been attacked viciously by the very people who are telling you that they’re about to stand on the front line of the Muslim registry program.”

She drew similar restrictions around people in the feminist movement just a year later in an interview with The Nation.

“It just doesn’t make any sense for someone to say, ‘Is there room for people who support the State of Israel and do not criticize it in the movement?’ There can’t be in feminism,” Sarsour said. “You either stand up for the rights of all women, including Palestinians, or none. There’s just no way around it.”

NYU Linda Sarsour should talk with this Linda Sarsour.

Sarsour warned her NYU audience against forces that seek to divide Jews and Muslims, and Jews and black people.

“So you ever wonder why somebody would want to figure out how to pin up Jewish Americans and Muslim Americans?” she asked. “Who benefits from that? Who benefits from dividing these communities? Who benefits from dividing black people from Jews — who, by the way, there are black Jews, let’s be clear. Who benefits from the divisions? Not us. Not Jewish people. Not Muslims. We don’t benefit. In fact, you know what that does? It’s divide and conquer. It actually makes us all vulnerable. So I don’t play into that.”

At no time did Sarsour acknowledge her own contributions to dividing Jews from Muslims and from black people.

Her 2016 AMP speech, for example, included her frustration at “Muslims willing to sell Palestine just for a little acceptance and nod from the white man and white power in these United States of America.”

Last September, she blamed Jews for police shootings of unarmed black people because of an Anti-Defamation League (ADL) program that takes police officials to Israel to learn about fighting terrorism and riots. The ADL is the most prominent Jewish organization in the United States. To Sarsour, this leads directly to “What? Stop and frisk, killing unarmed black people across the country.”

She made a similar assertion during a speech in 2015 at the 20th anniversary of avowed antisemite and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan’s “Million Man March.”

“The same people who justify the massacres of Palestinian people and call it collateral damage are the same people who justify the murder of black young men and women,” she said.

On Monday at NYU, the same person accused others of trying to divide Jews and black people.

She also claimed to stand by women in countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia who are fighting compulsory hijab laws. If she doesn’t say it often, it’s because she’s already got too much on her plate, she claimed. And she endorsed equality for gays, lesbians, and transgender people.

“What’s so radical about believing that LGBTQIA people deserve to be safe in every space that they’re in?” she asked. “What’s so radical about that?”

There is a place in the Middle East where LGBT people can live safely and serve openly in the military, and that’s Israel. Sarsour doesn’t talk about that reality, and Israel haters dismiss it as “pinkwashing,” a transparent and superficial Israeli decision that is not rooted in equality, but a scheme to make Israel look good.

But contrast that with Palestinian public opinion. A 2013 Pew poll found that 93 percent of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza believe their society should not accept homosexuality, while four percent thought it should. The question didn’t go as far as gay marriage — just whether society should accept gay people.

Sarsour didn’t address this or any other way that Hamas and the Palestinian Authority serve as obstacles to the peace she says she wants. She twice described herself as “a visionary” Monday night, but received no challenging questions except for those shouted from the audience. The moderator’s final question: “What gives you hope?”

We hope her audience didn’t fall for this attempt to soften Sarsour’s image as accepting and inclusive.

Audio and video of Sarsour’s remarks can be found here on the Investigative Project on Terrorism website.

Steven Emerson is considered one of the leading authorities on Islamic extremist networks, financing and operations. He serves as the Executive Director of The Investigative Project on Terrorism, a non-profit organization that serves one of the world’s largest storehouses of archival data and intelligence on Islamic and Middle Eastern terrorist groups.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.