Saturday, December 14th | 16 Kislev 5780

Subscribe
November 6, 2019 7:49 am

UK Paper Fails to Challenge the Lies of HRW’s Omar Shakir

avatar by Adam Levick

Opinion

Omar Shakir is seen at a hearing at the district court in Jerusalem, March 11, 2019. Photo: Reuters / Ammar Awad.

The Guardian is adept at amplifying, and failing to critically scrutinize, the unsubstantiated claims and accusations of anti-Israel NGOs, and its recent article about the Israeli Supreme Court decision on Human Right Watch (HRW)’s regional director Omar Shakir — a longtime BDS activist — follows this pattern.

First, as we predicted in a tweet before the article by Oliver Holmes (“Israel can deport Human Rights Watch official, court rules,” Nov. 5) was published, the piece uncritically cites Shakir’s unhinged response to the court’s decision:

Shakir wrote on Twitter that if he was kicked out, Israel would join the ranks of Iran, North Korea, and Egypt in blocking access to Human Rights Watch staff. “We won’t stop. And we won’t be the last,” he said.

The truth is that democracies all over the world reserve the right to deny entry to those seen as intent on harming the state. Moreover, there are in excess of 350 NGOs (such as HRW) operating freely in Israel, even those who continually delegitimize the country, support BDS, and even reject Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state.

The denial of a work visa to one employee of one of these NGOs — after careful consideration by the country’s internationally respected Supreme Court — wouldn’t even minimally change the democratic nature of Israel. The human rights organization Freedom House continually ranks Israel as the only truly free and democratic country in the region, and the suggestion that this status will change due merely to the Supreme Court’s decision on Shakir’s work visa is risible.

In a subsequent paragraph in the article, Holmes makes the following claim about the broader effort by Israel to fight BDS — a movement, let’s remember, whose leaders oppose the continued existence of a Jewish state:

In its most high-profile use, Israel blocked in August two US congresswomen, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, from a planned trip to Palestine and Jerusalem.

However, as The Guardian itself reported on August 16, the Israeli prime minister subsequently decided to let Tlaib visit the West Bank on humanitarian grounds — so she could visit her grandmother. Though the Congresswoman rejected the prime minister’s offer, the claim that Israel “blocked” her entry is misleading.

Holmes misleads again here:

HRW says the Shakir case is significant as it is the first time the [Israeli] government has used the anti-BDS legislation to try to deport someone legally working in the country.

Shakir’s two-year work visa was granted in 2016 and expired in 2018. In May 2018, the Israeli Ministry of the Interior chose not to renew the work visa due to his support for BDS. So since that time, in light of his appeal to the courts, Shakir has been allowed to remain in the country, and continue his work at HRW, without a valid work visa.

Holmes continues:

Shakir has argued he had not called for any form of boycott of Israel during his time at HRW.

If Holmes had done even a little research, he’d see that Shakir is clearly lying. An analysis of Shakir’s Twitter activity from June 2018 to February 2019 by NGO Monitor proves that he’s expressed support for BDS on numerous occasions while working in Israel. NGO Monitor shows that of the 970 tweets by Shakir during this period, “151 (16%) focus on BDS campaigns against Booking.com and TripAdvisor.” Countless other tweets promote other forms of delegitimization.

Here’s one example of a pro-BDS tweet, from November 2018, supporting Airbnb’s initial decision to boycott Jewish owned properties in the West Bank:

In this tweet from only a few days ago, he even lends legitimacy to the idea of boycotting companies doing business within pre-1967 boundaries:

Finally, it’s telling — though not at all surprising — that the Guardian reporter not only failed to challenge the claims of Shakir and HRW, but didn’t cite even one quote from anyone critical of Shakir or supportive of the court’s decision.

As is often the case when reporting on anti-Israel NGOs, The Guardian article reads more like a HRW press release than anything resembling professional journalism.

Adam Levick covers the British media for CAMERA, the 65,000-member, Boston-based Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.