Is Europe Facing Another Decade of Jihad?
Error: Contact form not found.
by Abigail R. Esman

French police are seen in front of the Paris Police headquarters, Oct. 3, 2019. Photo: Reuters / Christian Hartmann.
For most of Europe, the end of 2019 marked the close of a decade of jihad, of terrorist attacks in the streets, of bombers, shooters, and knife-wielding self-styled warriors rampaging restaurants and theaters, stadiums and concert halls, Christmas markets and kosher markets, trains, museums, magazine offices, and airports.
But according to a newly-released report from Dutch intelligence and security agency AIVD, 2020 will not bring with it an end to such attacks. Rather, more jihadist activity should be expected, not only in the Netherlands, but throughout Europe and the West.
There is some good news: the number of attacks in the West decreased significantly in 2018-2019, from a record high of 211 in 2015 to just 16 in 2019 as of this writing. This is largely thanks to vastly improved intelligence procedures that interrupted dozens of terrorist plots, such as the June arrest in Belgium of a man planning an attack on the American embassy, and of 20 suspects in Copenhagen, Denmark, last month. The gradual decline of the Islamic State was also an important factor, the AIVD indicated, as fewer European fighters departed for the region, and Europe tightened its watch of those who attempted to return home after fighting for the terrorist group.
Accordingly, the Dutch National Coordinator of Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) has reduced the terror threat level from 4 to 3 (on a scale of 5) for the first time since 2016. But even in doing so, both the NCTV and AIVD warn that another attack is likely. More, the AIVD expects radicalization and the spread of violent Islamist ideology to increase throughout the West.
Indeed, despite the killing by American troops of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the AIVD warns, “ISIS’s underground battle for jihad continues in its central region (Syria and Iraq). And there is a chance, too, that individual ISIS sympathizers will use his death as a reason to take revenge by staging further attacks.”
What’s more, as Al-Qaeda continues its resurgence, its intentions to attack European targets pose an additional danger.
“Al Qaida controls a base in Syria and elsewhere, facilitating networks in Turkey, among others, and networks of supporters in most Western countries,” the AIVD said.
But the greatest threat seems to come from Salafist influences, including the long arm of the Saudi government, in educational and religious institutions throughout the West. Salafist lessons at religious schools and Muslim community centers are a particularly large problem in the Netherlands, though the AIVD and others believe similar programs are in place in other European countries.
“Promoters of Salafism systematically build intolerant, anti-integrative and anti-democratic ideology in Holland’s extracurricular religious education — and thereby, among children and youth,” the AIVD reported. “In practice, this means that an unknown number of Dutch children are told from an early age that a Muslim should ‘turn away’ from or’ hate’ non-Muslims, dissenting Muslims, Dutch society and the democratic social order.” Such indoctrination, it says, can easily lead to radicalization.
Growing networks of Salafist leaders, many funded by Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar, exacerbate the problem, the report says. While many have been educated in Medina and are therefore fluent in Arabic — giving them a certain level of prestige in the Dutch Muslim community — the majority, the AIVD says, “were raised in the Netherlands, had a Dutch education, and speak fluent Dutch.” And yet, “their strategy, agenda, and message is entirely in conflict with Dutch democratic law and order.”
What’s more, the Saudis help support the creation of Dutch-language religious lessons that continue to promote that anti-Democratic, anti-Western message. “Hence,” notes the report, “through their systematic efforts, these Salafist promoters are making their doctrines go mainstream.”
The fact that such efforts take place Europe-wide, however, makes the Salafist threat and the Middle Eastern funding of Western Islamic education all the more alarming — not only in terms of security, says the AIVD, but in respect to integration. “In most West European countries, developments with Salafism and its followers are similar to what we have in the Netherlands,” the report says, though adds that, “the influence and the networks may take a different form among various migrant groups and other national differences.”
Moreover, the AIVD report authors cite a 2018 report from the Institute Montaigne, “The Factory of Islamism,” which showed that that the “systematic dissemination of intolerant, anti-integrative and anti-democratic ideological concepts by Salafists has far-reaching polarizing effects on coexistence in Western European democracies; and, because of the risk of radicalization, it ultimately also has an effect on safety.”
Adding to the challenge is the pending release of terrorists whose sentences end in the next three years, said counter-terrorism consultant Jason Walters, Likely to further spread Salafist doctrine — a doctrine many of them learned from those same Saudi-funded schools and mosques — they, too, are cause for concern. “We saw what could happen in London,” Walters notes, referring to the November 29 knife attack on London Bridge, carried out by a jihadist who completed his sentence and claimed to have renounced radicalism.
In addition, reports the AIVD, while little recruiting is taking place among incarcerated Dutch terrorists, “new networks are developing that are likely to continue after their release.”
Still, says Walters, who is a former Islamist terrorist himself, the rise and fall of the Islamic State has also had some unexpected consequences. “The legacy of ISIS seems to have changed the dynamic somewhat,” he says. “It’s pushed some towards more extremism, but it has emboldened a counter-movement. Atheism has really become a thing in the Middle East, for example.”
Does that suggest a reason for hope in the long run? Possibly. But such changes take time, and any promise lies in the far future. For now, it seems, even as the last decade ends, the dangers of jihadist terror will continue.
Abigail R. Esman, the author, most recently, of Radical State: How Jihad Is Winning Over Democracy in the West (Praeger, 2010), is a freelance writer based in New York and the Netherlands Her next book, on domestic abuse and terrorism, will be published by Potomac Books. Follow her at @radicalstates.
A version of this article was originally published by The Investigative Project on Terrorism.
Iran Says No Final Decision Made on Deal That Trump Hopes Could Be Signed Soon
Iran Shows No Active Uranium Enrichment, but Nuclear Program Not Fully Dismantled, Experts Say
Antisemitism Becomes a Daily Reality for Jews in Germany as Hate Crimes Hit Record High
UN Adviser Francesca Albanese Mocks Mother of Oct. 7 Victim
New Survey Suggests Americans View US-Israel Interests as ‘Aligned’
Iran Warns It May Stop World Cup Matches if Provoked With Unauthorized Flags, Symbols
Pro-Israel Entertainment Industry Group Rejects Cultural Boycott of Israeli Director Nadav Lapid
US Plans to Deport Iranians to Central African Republic, Sources Say
Slovenia Lifts Ban on Arms Trade With Israel
Trump Cancels US Strikes on Iran, Citing Progress in Talks





Pride and Prejudice: How Antisemitism Captured LGBTQ+ Spaces
The New York Times Is Spreading Hatred Against Jews — Why Do Brands Go Along?
How Did Zoroastrianism Affect Judaism?
Banned From Turkey for Supporting Israel’s Right to Exist: The Price of Dissent
UN Adviser Francesca Albanese Mocks Mother of Oct. 7 Victim



