Monday, January 25th | 12 Shevat 5781

Subscribe
December 3, 2020 10:25 am

Antisemitism Watchdog Urges Georgetown to Act Over Article Insulting Kristallnacht

avatar by JNS.org

A view of Georgetown University. Photo: Mario Roberto Durán Ortiz via Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.org – The Combat Anti-Semitism Movement, an antisemitism watchdog group, is calling on Georgetown University to take concrete action over an article in a publication of one of its programs.

The article, written by Austrian political scientist Farid Hafez in the Bridge Initiative—a multi-year research project on Islamophobia in Georgetown University—“exploited and cheapened the memory of the Kristallnacht pogrom, in order to criticize the Austrian government’s actions tackling radical Islamism,” the group said.

In the piece, Hafez criticized the recent questioning by Austrian authorities of dozens of people it suspects of being radical Islamist activists, which “reminded” him of the treatment of Uyghur Muslims by China. He also claimed that the actions of the Austrian government “undermines the credibility of its Kristallnacht commemorations,” noting that the arrests occurred on the anniversary of the infamous pogrom.

Officials in Austria have spoken out about Hafez’s article. Two federal government ministers, Susanne Raab and Karl Nehammer, have condemned it. Raab termed Hafez’s Kristallnacht reference a “monstrous comparison,” while Nehammer called it “completely tasteless.”

Related coverage

January 25, 2021 6:13 pm
0

Carleton University Resolution Targets Definition of Antisemitism, Warns Canadian Jewish Organization

B'nai Brith Canada called on Ottawa's Carleton University to "act responsibly" and reject a resolution against the leading definition of...

Meanwhile, Austrian sociologist and Islamic theologian Mouhanad Khorchide also censured equating “the beginning of the murder of millions of Jews with a raid.”

The University of Salzburg, where Hafez is currently a lecturer and researcher, has also publicly distanced itself from his article. Its rector, Hendrik Lehnert, indicated that disciplinary procedures are being examined. The head of its political-science department, Professor Reinhard Heinisch, said he has “absolutely no understanding for comparing the procedure in a democratic constitutional state like Austria with events during the Nazi era.”

Combat Anti-Semitism Movement notes that by comparison, no such public condemnation or even acknowledgment of the offense caused by Hafez’s article has been forthcoming from Georgetown. CAM strongly urges the university to publicly distance itself from the article, censure Hafez and thoroughly review publication procedures at the Bridge Initiative.

“There can be no excuse for abusing the memory of the Holocaust in order to make a political point,” said Sacha Roytman-Dratwa, director of the Combat Anti-Semitism Movement. “Farid Hafez’s article demeans the unparalleled persecution of Jews by the Nazis and cheapens the memory of all those who suffered. Doing so only undermines today’s ongoing struggle against antisemitism, racism and hatred.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.