Sunday, September 26th | 20 Tishri 5782

Subscribe
August 3, 2021 11:10 am
0

Why Does the Media Uncritically Cite the Council on American-Islamic Relations?

avatar by Rachel O'Donoghue

Opinion

The CAIR logo. Photo: Wiki Commons.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is no stranger to controversy. The organization bills itself as helping to promote the understanding of Islam, protecting civil rights, and empowering American Muslims.

However, since its inception in 1994, the organization has been dogged with allegations of antisemitism; furthermore, it was proven to have links to a group convicted of steering funds to Hamas, and its co-founder has promoted anti-Israel conspiracy theories.

But despite these years of scandals and connections to terrorism, numerous media outlets seem to have no problem using CAIR as its go-to authority on anything related to Muslims in the United States.

For example, CNN just reported on a CAIR press release that alleged there had been a spike in Islamophobic incidents this year under the headline, “Advocacy group publishes mid-year report highlighting spike in anti-Muslim crimes and bias.” According to CAIR, there were “500 complaints of anti-Muslim bias incidents between January and July 2021 alone,” which included “hate crimes, harassment, school bullying, discrimination, hate speech, and anti-mosque incidents.”

In the preface to its recent snapshot, CAIR claims there was an “uptick” in anti-Muslim bias during the Israel-Hamas conflict in May, citing four mosque incidents and several physical assaults. The use of the word “alone” when presenting its figures for the seven-month period implies this year has been uniquely, or particularly, bad for American Muslims.

However, CAIR’s own figures for 2020 show it received 6,144 complaints of similar types of bias — an average of 512 per month. CAIR does not offer any numbers that support this alleged increase in Islamophobia during the Gaza conflict, but CNN is still content to say there was a “spike” in such crimes anyway.

Considering these vague statistics, it is ironic that following the Anti-Defamation League’s report on antisemitism during the same period, CAIR took to the publishing platform Medium to describe the ADL’s figures as “at best, mischaracterized, and at worst, simply incorrect.”

When reporting on the ADL’s numbers, The Insider also opted to include CAIR’s unsupported allegations in its headline.

The Insider’s article from July 10, “The ADL says violence in Israel and Palestine caused a rise in antisemitism. Critics, including CAIR, have said the statistics are misleading,” states:

For example, instances where demonstrators chanted “Intifada!” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” across the street from the Temple Beth Israel synagogue in Skokie, IL, were listed as antisemitic.

While the publication notes that there were a number of critics who disputed the ADL’s figures in its headline, it does not offer any more information on who they might be. It appears that the reference to multiple critics is an attempt to add more credibility to CAIR’s claim that the ADL was disingenuous with its data.

And the media has even gone further than simply uncritically publishing CAIR press releases and using the organization as a rent-a-quote source.

In 2019, The Washington Post published a “fact checker” article after remarks made by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) during a speech at CAIR’s Annual Banquet were criticized. The Post article says:

CAIR is not a terrorist organization, but an aggressive Muslim civil liberties organization, modeled on the Anti-Defamation League. The US government has never charged it with terrorism, but it was named as an “unindicted co-conspirator or joint venturer” in the Holy Land Foundation case — an Islamic charity that in 2008 was convicted of funding Islamist militant groups.

The piece then goes on to explain that CAIR and nearly 250 other organizations and individuals were also named in the case, which resulted in numerous people who ran the now-defunct Islamic charity the Holy Land Foundation being convicted of sending millions of dollars to Hamas. It adds that CAIR’s association with “groups later deemed to have links to terrorism predated any official US designation.”

The fact-checker article, however, totally omits one particularly inconvenient fact: that the co-founder of CAIR’s Dallas, Texas, chapter, Ghassan Elashi, was sentenced to 65 years in prison for his role in the Holy Land Foundation case. Nor does the article acknowledge that the FBI severed all ties with CAIR after “evidence at the trial linked [its] leaders to Hamas.”

The FBI has since maintained a policy of no non-investigative interactions with the organization.

A story published by The Hill on May 15 quotes at length CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad, following the decision by the group and others to boycott the White House’s annual Eid celebration.

In what can only be described as an anti-Israel screed, Awad describes Israel as being ruled by an “apartheid government” that engages in “indiscriminate bombing” of Palestinians. The Hill does not offer any kind of context or fact-checking for Awad’s wild assertions, such as the patently untrue claim that Israel non-selectively bombs the Gaza Strip.

Awad also has a long history of peddling antisemitic and anti-Israeli conspiracy theories, including claims that the Jewish state has “corrupted” US political leaders, and suggesting that a pro-Israel lobby controls American policy.

These are just a few examples of the authoritative voice CAIR is granted in the media. HonestReporting’s own data shows that the organization has been referred to no fewer than 508 times in the press in the last 30 days alone. Between January 2021 and the time of publishing this article, CAIR received 11,700 media mentions.

These outlets should consider the organization’s checkered history before uncritically using its leaders as sources.

Rachel O’Donoghue is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.