Tuesday, March 19th | 9 Adar II 5784

Subscribe
January 18, 2022 11:57 am
0

Texas Synagogue Attack Was Motivated by Antisemitism — But Not for the New York Times and BBC

× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

avatar by Gidon Ben-Zvi

Opinion

A person walks across a street lined with terraced housing in Blackburn, Britain, January 17, 2022. REUTERS/Phil Noble

Is it anti-Jewish to take hostages at a synagogue, with the goal of getting a notoriously antisemitic terrorist released from prison? For The New York Times and the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), the answer is unclear.

Despite recent developments, the two outlets have not accurately detailed the nature of Saturday’s attack at Congregation Beth Israel in Colleyville, Texas. As a result, millions of people around the world may doubt that holding Jews captive in a Jewish house of prayer is “not specifically related to the Jewish community.”

Many news organizations cited in their coverage a statement by Matthew Desarno, special agent in charge of FBI Dallas, who, at an earlier news conference, suggested that the hostage-taker was “specifically focused on one issue.”

Desarno was referring to Malik Faisal Akram’s demand that Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani national sentenced to 86 years in prison for the attempted murder of American personnel in Afghanistan, be immediately released. Siddiqui, dubbed “Lady Al Qaeda,” wrote that Jews “have always back-stabbed everyone who has taken pity on them and made the ‘fatal’ error of giving them shelter.”

During her trial, she told the presiding judge that she did not want any Jewish people in the jury, “if they have a Zionist or Israeli background,” adding that “everyone here is [Israeli], subject to genetic testing.” Shortly after her conviction, Siddiqui declared: “This is a verdict coming from Israel and not from America. That’s where the anger belongs.”

The perpetrator of Saturday’s attack, Malik Akram, forced the Texas synagogue’s rabbi to call Manhattan’s Central Synagogue, a law enforcement source told The New York Post. Akram demanded to speak to leading Reform Rabbi Angela Buchdahl, so she could use her “influence” to help get Siddiqui freed. According to President Joe Biden, Akram furthermore made “antisemitic and anti-Israeli comments” throughout the standoff.

News sites ran with Desarno’s early comments, prompting similar headlines in the Associated Press, the BBC, and other publications.

Desarno’s remarks ignited a social media firestorm:

In a statement released on Sunday, the FBI walked back Desarno’s claim.

“This is a terrorism-related matter, in which the Jewish community was targeted, and is being investigated by the Joint Terrorism Task Force,” the bureau said, adding that “preventing acts of terrorism and violence is the number one priority of the FBI.”

In response, many news outlets that had included the earlier “not connected to Jewish community” assertion updated their reporting (for example, see NBC, ABC, and the AP’s coverage).

Two notable exceptions to this example of journalistic due diligence have been The New York Times and the BBC.

In 2021, the Times ignored the Anti-Defamation League’s (ADL) annual summary that found antisemitic incidents had remained at historic high levels across the United States in the previous year. This lack of interest from one of the world’s most widely read news organizations is especially curious because the ADL’s Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents was reported on by local news media.

And with regards to the BBC, this is the latest in a series of events that together raise serious questions about the BBC’s impartiality regarding Israel and the Jewish people. Last year, HonestReporting helped expose the antisemitic tweets of reporter Tala Halawa. After an HonestReporting tweet went viral, the issue received widespread media coverage, and the BBC eventually fired Halawa a few weeks later. Another HonestReporting investigation thereafter uncovered numerous antisemitic social posts by a different BBC employee, Nasima Begum. And the BBC recently defamed Jewish victims of an antisemitic attack in London.

The Times and the BBC must make clear that the evidence underpinning the FBI’s investigation into a hostage incident that garnered global attention shows that it was indeed an antisemitic attack.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared. Akiva Van Koningsveld contributed to this report

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.