Wednesday, July 15th | 1 Av 5786

Subscribe

Hakeem Jeffries Announces He Will Not House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has come out against a bid to cut off US military aid to Israel, while calling for a “major reset” of Washington’s relationship with the Jewish state. In a “Dear Colleague” letter to fellow Democrats on Tuesday, Jeffries said he would vote against an amendment led by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), and co-sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), that would strip roughly $3.3 billion in annual military financing for Israel — while preserving $500 million for missile-defense programs such as Iron Dome — from the fiscal 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. The House could vote on the measure as early as this week. Aligning himself with the ranking Democrats on the Appropriations and Foreign Affairs committees, Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Gregory Meeks (D-NY), as well as the advocacy group J Street, Jeffries called the proposal too sweeping. “As written, it is overly broad in that it prohibits or would limit the use of funds for longstanding initiatives related to humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, peace-building and US Embassy operations,” he wrote, adding that the “so-called Massie amendment” would restrict US efforts to confront Hamas, Hezbollah “and other terrorist organizations in the region who are sworn enemies of both the United States and Israel.” Citing deep divisions within the party over Israel, Jeffries said leadership would not pressure members to follow his lead. “There are good faith reasons that will result in Members voting in a variety of different ways with respect to the amendment,” he wrote, noting that the caucus was not whipping the vote. At the same time, Jeffries argued that US policy toward the region “must change,” tying his call for a “major reset” to criticism of what he termed the “far-right Netanyahu government.” He wrote that America’s commitment to “Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and homeland for the Jewish people must remain ironclad,” while urging strong US support for the creation of an independent Palestinian state. Israeli governments have long rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state along Israel’s borders, warning that it would pose an existential security threat and leave major population centers exposed to attack. Jeffries also said Gaza must undergo “complete reconstruction and modernization” and that “Hamas must be disarmed and removed from power.” Jeffries further signaled that the next US-Israel aid agreement should require Israel to cover more of its own defense costs. The current 10-year memorandum of understanding, signed under President Barack Obama in 2016, provides Israel about $3.8 billion annually — $3.3 billion in military financing and $500 million for missile defense — and expires in 2028. “Israel has an advanced economy and is capable of paying for its own sophisticated weapons, as the Prime Minister recently acknowledged,” Jeffries wrote, adding that any future arrangement should mirror US defense agreements with other Western allies and “strictly adhere to our human rights laws and values.” His stance placed him between the two poles of a party increasingly split over Israel. Hours after his letter circulated, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX), sent a competing letter urging Democrats to back the Massie amendment, and progressives including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said they would vote to cut the aid. Support for Israel among Democratic voters has fallen sharply during the war in Gaza. An Associated Press-NORC poll conducted in June found that 52 percent of Democrats say Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians, while a Pew Research Center survey found that roughly 80 percent of Democrats hold a negative view of Israel. In April, a majority of Senate Democrats — 40 of the caucus’s 47 members — voted for at least one of two resolutions to block certain arms sales to Israel, though the measures failed. Supporters of continued assistance say it preserves Israel’s qualitative military edge and bolsters a key US partner against Iran-backed groups, while critics want aid conditioned on Israeli policy changes, particularly over the conduct of the war in Gaza. The upcoming vote is expected to underscore the widening gap between the party’s pro-Israel wing and its growing bloc of aid critics. for Amendment to Strip Israel Aid

July 5, 2023 4:57 pm

Tel Aviv Rocked by Fierce Protests Following ‘Politically Motivated’ Ousting of Police Chief

×

Error: Contact form not found.

avatar by Ben Cohen

Israelis protest the ousting of Tel Aviv police chief Amichai Eshed. Photo: Reuters/Nir Elias

Protestors engaged in fierce clashes with police in Tel Aviv on Wednesday night, as thousands of Israelis took to the streets of the city to protest the ousting of its veteran police chief, Amichai Eshed, amid claims from ministers in the right-wing coalition government that he was too restrained in his handling of protests against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposed judicial reforms.

The most serious confrontation took place on the Ayalon Highway, where protestors waving Israeli flags lit bonfires and blocked traffic. One irate driver reportedly attempted to plow through the crowd, injuring at least one protestor before he was pulled over and arrested.

Police fired water cannon at the protestors as local media outlets reported that they were struggling to restore order. Some residents of surrounding apartment buildings lit fireworks in a gesture of solidarity, drawing appreciative cheers from the assembled protestors below.

With Israel rocked by protests lasting several months against the government’s radical plans to place the judiciary under greater political control, Eshed had been singled out by government figures — among them the far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir — for allegedly treating the demonstrators with kid gloves.

“With my head held high I am paying an intolerably heavy personal price for my choice to avert a civil war,” Eshed said at a press conference following his removal. “I intend to end my service in the police after an orderly handover to my replacement.”

He continued: “I could have easily used disproportionate force and filled the ER at Ichilov [Medical Center] at the end of every demonstration in Tel Aviv. We could have cleared Ayalon [Highway] within minutes at the terrible cost of cracking heads and breaking bones, at the cost of breaking the pact between police and the citizenry.”

Eshed added that he had “taught generations of policemen to recognize the limits of force, to safeguard our contract with the public… Unfortunately, for the first time in my three decades of service, I was met with the bizarre reality that calm and order are not the desired goal, but rather the opposite is.”

At a separate press conference, a furious Ben Gvir accused Eshed of “surrendering to the Israeli left.”

“The trickle of politics into senior police positions is a dangerous crossing of a line,” he went on. He claimed that the current government had been “elected to restore equality under the law, not to allow a police force to behave one way toward [settlers] and another way toward Haredim [Orthodox Jews] and leftist activists.”

In addition to the Ayalon Highway, protesters blocked several intersections around the country as well as gathering in the center of Jerusalem, the nation’s capital. Clashes were also reported outside Netanyahu’s official residence on Azza Street in Jerusalem.

The conflict over Eshed stretches back to March, when Ben Gvir announced that he was transferring him to a new position — widely regarded as a demotion — on the recommendation of Israeli Police Commissioner Kobi Shabtai.

 

 

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Email a copy of to a friend
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.