Thursday, March 22nd | 6 Nisan 5778


Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

May 27, 2015 4:38 pm

Amnesty Using Hamas Crimes as Another Excuse to Attack Israel

avatar by Elder of Ziyon

Email a copy of "Amnesty Using Hamas Crimes as Another Excuse to Attack Israel" to a friend
IDF soldiers pictured in Gaza in July, during Operation Protective Edge. Photo: Israel Defense Forces.

IDF soldiers pictured in Gaza in July, during Operation Protective Edge. Photo: Israel Defense Forces.

Some people were surprised that Amnesty International issued a report actually condemning Hamas for brutally killing “collaborators” during last summer’s Gaza war.

Hamas forces carried out a brutal campaign of abductions, torture and unlawful killings against Palestinians accused of “collaborating” with Israel and others during Israel’s military offensive against Gaza in July and August 2014, according to a new report by Amnesty International.

‘Strangling Necks’: Abduction, torture and summary killings of Palestinians by Hamas forces during the 2014 Gaza/Israel conflict highlights a series of abuses, such as the extrajudicial execution of at least 23 Palestinians and the arrest and torture of dozens of others, including members and supporters of Hamas’s political rivals, Fatah.

“It is absolutely appalling that, while Israeli forces were inflicting massive death and destruction upon the people in Gaza, Hamas forces took the opportunity to ruthlessly settle scores, carrying out a series of unlawful killings and other grave abuses,” said Philip Luther, Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Amnesty International.

However, it is interesting to see how Amnesty talks about Israel in this report.

For starters, Amnesty must hang onto the illusion that Israel still occupies Gaza, even though they know very well that under international law, occupiers are responsible for maintaining the legal system of the occupied and Israel cannot do that. So it writes nonsensical passages like this:

The legal situation in Gaza is complex due to the applicability of several distinct and overlapping bodies of international law, which provide the framework for examining the duties and obligations of various authorities with regard to the abuses described in this report. Those parties include Israel as the overall occupying power, the Hamas de facto administration in Gaza, the Palestinian authorities based in Ramallah in the West Bank, and the unity administration agreed between all Palestinian factions to which president Abbas appointed ministers in June 2014. …In legal terms, Gaza has remained under Israeli occupation since June 1967 and Israel’s actions as the occupying power are regulated by the law of occupation, notably the Fourth Geneva Convention.26

Footnote 26:

The nature of that occupation of the West Bank and Gaza has shifted over the years, but Israel has maintained overall effective control – the sine qua non of belligerent occupation. Israel remains the occupying power in Gaza and continues to be bound by the law of occupation, particularly as regards the powers it continues to exercise over the population of Gaza. This does not negate the responsibilities of the Hamas authorities, who have had de facto administration over internal affairs in the Gaza Strip since June 2007, or those of the Palestinian authorities, which have jurisdiction over internal affairs in parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territories under the Oslo Accords.

Amnesty is creating a legal framework that simply doesn’t exist to ensure that Israel is considered an “occupier” of territory that Amnesty knows Israel doesn’t have effective control over.

If Israel cannot dismiss a Gaza judge or a Gaza policeman, it is not the occupier. From the ICRC:

As legitimate State authority has now passed into the hands of the occupying power, the latter must take all measures in its power to restore and ensure, as far as possible, law and order and public safety.

This is expanded here:

One of the most pressing tasks faced by any military government is the maintenance of law and order. With government buildings, stores, hospitals, and cultural facilities being looted, revenge killings taking place, and general lawlessness preventing the delivery of humanitarian aid, this has become an omnipresent concern for the coalition forces in Iraq. Their responsibility in this regard is unambiguously set forth in the U.S. Army’s Field Manual 27-10: “The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety.” Thus, although there have been assertions that the coalition forces are not police, in fact occupation law imposes policing responsibilities on them during an occupation.

Although occupation forces must maintain law and order, pre-existing civil and criminal laws of the occupied territory remain in effect to the extent they are apolitical, consistent with the maintenance of public order, and otherwise appropriate (e.g., discriminatory or inhumane laws are void); understandably, members of the occupying forces are immune from the jurisdiction of local law enforcement and judicial authorities. The Occupying Power may issue regulations, including penal regulations, necessary to meet its obligations under occupation law.Common examples include censorship of the media, limitations on public gatherings, and control over travel and means of transportation (whether private or public). Penal provisions cannot be retroactive and do not come into effect until published in the inhabitants’ language. Overall, occupation law seeks a balance between the maintenance of order and the preservation of the pre-existing legal order.

Obviously all of these are impossible for Israel, meaning Israel isn’t occupying Gaza. But Amnesty clings onto their absurd definition. (It does fall short of directly blaming Israel for not creating a judicial system that could prosecute Hamas war criminals, knowing that such a call would open it up to ridicule.)

At the end of the report, though, Amnesty reveals a possible reason why it issued this report ostensibly against Hamas – in order to pressure Israel to do what Amnesty wants!


The Israeli authorities should co-operate with any independent and impartial international investigation, judicial or non-judicial, including the work of the Commission of Inquiry set up by the UN Human Rights Council in July 2014 and any follow-up mechanisms established by the Council, by offering complete access to relevant personnel, documents, and other material. They should seek to ensure that the cases documented in this report, among others, are investigated impartially and independently and that, wherever there is sufficient admissible evidence, any alleged perpetrator is brought to justice in proceedings that fully respect international fair trial standards.

They should also:

 Allow Amnesty International and other human rights organizations, as well as UN appointed investigators, including any follow-up mechanisms to the Commission of Inquiry and UN special rapporteurs, unrestricted access to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including the Gaza Strip, to investigate these and other suspected violations of international law by all parties to the conflict;

Because of Hamas crimes?

 Co-operate with any investigation of the International Criminal Court, or national courts undertaking investigations under domestic universal jurisdiction laws;

Is the ICC interested in prosecuting Hamas?

 Rescind any punitive measures taken following Palestine’s signature of the Rome Statute and refrain from imposing any additional punitive measures if the Palestinian authorities take further steps to pursue international justice for crimes under international law;

What does this have to do with the subject of the report?

 Completely lift the blockade on the Gaza Strip, including by permitting the unrestricted transfer of construction materials into the Gaza Strip and the transfer of goods from Gaza to Israel and the West Bank, subject only to necessary and proportionate security checks, as an essential step towards addressing the shelter and protection needs of Gaza’s 1.8 million civilians;

What does this have to do with the subject of the report?

 Accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and issue a declaration accepting the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction since 1 July 2002.

What does this have to do with the subject of the report?

Under the excuse of allowing any UN or international investigation into Hamas activity – investigations that simply will never happen – Amnesty is demanding that Israel open itself up to biased prosecutions, for example under the Rome Statute that includes text written specifically to damn Israel and no other country.

Amnesty isn’t interested in justice for Hamas. It wants to use Hamas as a fig-leaf to issue more ultimatums against Israel.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Pierre Elie Mamou

    Just a question: who pays this judeophobic association to vomit so much lies ?

  • Jarred

    Hamas couldn’t give a rats for what AI has to say about anything….It is only Israel that takes notice of AI,and goes into shock taking notice of these sanctimonious hypocrites…..

  • Lauren Goldman

    Amnesty International has become just another mouthpiece for the ‘palestinian’ cause, along with Jewish Voice for Peace, J Street and the UN.

  • Ken Kelso

    Great article Elder exposing Amnesty’s lies on Israel controlling Gaza.

  • Isaac Brajtman

    Who pays the salaries of A.I.? These guys don’t seem to understand whats going on in the middle ( should say muddle) east and should be fired

  • Kaz Thorpe

    I have resigned from amnesty due to their obvious bias and stance against Israel. The organisation has now moved away from their mission state and become political

  • Glad you check these biased allegations of Amnesty International. Shalom – Paul

  • Uriel Priwes

    Everyone knows that any pretence of impartiality by Amnesty International regarding the Middle East is completely and absolutely false. This organization has made no secret of its aim of demonizing Israel. Its views and comments are not worthy o consideration by any fair minded person.

  • Ephraim

    Amnesty International, formerly a worthy organization, has fallen into the deep trap of Antisemitism on which so many NGOs now base their existence. No longer are they concerned with tortured people or governmental brutality. Its most important (sole?) concern is now attacking Israel. Its reason for existence is now to create propaganda with the sole purpose of denigrating Israel.

  • Julian Clovelley

    It is good to see these matters being approached in terms of International Law. However this is hardly the field for amateurs

    So with minimum analysis I draw attention to the Summary of Administrative and Legal Aspects in the ICRC document quoted:

    “These rules underline the basic concern of the law of occupation, which is to maintain the status quo ante (i.e. as it was before) in the occupied territory as far as is practically possible. This makes sense. The annexation of conquered territory is prohibited by international law. This necessarily means that if one State achieves power over parts of another State’s territory by force or threat of force, the situation must be considered temporary by international law. The international law of belligerent occupation must therefore be understood as meaning that the occupying power exercises provisional and temporary control over foreign territory. It follows from this that measures taken by the occupying authorities should avoid far-reaching changes in the existing order.

    (It is also worth mentioning that in these situations the population is confused and frightened enough without having to deal with completely new laws and officials)

    The law therefore ensures that central administrative functions continue uninterrupted in the interests of the population. The population will not be unduly undisturbed by foreign control if day-to-day matters continue to be dealt with by familiar administrative offices and public officials. Lastly, the occupied territory’s own judges are best placed to enforce the law..
    If the necessary administrative bodies or courts do not actually exist, if the laws do not meet generally accepted standards or if public officials or judges are unable or unwilling to perform their duties properly, then the occupying authorities must remedy the situation. In such cases, the law allows them to set up their own civilian administration and/or new courts to fill the vacuum.”

    The ICRC document is a plain English document rather than a complex legal analysis. However on the basis of this document alone the relationship of Israel to the West Bank/Gaza territories is highly questionable, and the attacks on Amnesty International in terms of “integrity” rather than academic legal dispute, totally unwarranted. The attempt to portray Amnesty International as anti-Israel per se is completely unreasonable. For example the following sentence in the article is contradicted by the ICRC document itself, which is quoted by the article writer as authoritative. The article writer says “If Israel cannot dismiss a Gaza judge or a Gaza policeman, it is not the occupier.” which is the exact opposite of the ICRC provision “The population will not be unduly undisturbed by foreign control if day-to-day matters continue to be dealt with by familiar administrative offices and public officials. Lastly, the occupied territory’s own judges are best placed to enforce the law.”

    Israeli Zionist attacks on bodies such as the ICRC, Oxfam and Amnesty International do not do Israel credit, or add to its credibility in the eyes of the world. Vast numbers of people who would normally be sympathetic to Israel’s plight out of simple human feeling, are deterred by such attacks on bodies possessed of very great integrity in the eyes of many who were horrified at the damage to Gaza’s civilian population, and at the impossible situation that Arab populations find themselves in within the West Bank and Gaza

    The same ICRC document quoted makes it abundantly clear that continuing occupation to the point of de facto annexation is unacceptable. Were it not made clear by the nature of Settlement in the West Bank that an occupation bordering on an annexation is in place the rhetoric of Zionism and the Israeli political Right would equally convey the same impression

    Many long term supporters of Amnesty International would be delighted to see the present situation submitted to the proper judgement of International Law – and rectified in accordance with it. Similarly they would be delighted to see the Israeli Government ratifying the International Criminal Court and submitting cases to it for investigation and legal process

    I read the tone of this article as expressing the attitude most resented, that Israel’s force combined with its mythology somehow should place it in a privileged position in Law – It doesn’t in the eyes of the world, and is the root cause of the items Israel and the Jewish community most resent, in the form of BDS – and most fear in the form of a rising and worrying antisemitism, which is an irrational flow on in prejudiced minds from rational concerns amongst the unprejudiced that the Zionist Right have itself been feeding through their own statements, claims, and behaviour.

    My suggestion to both Zionism and the Jewish community is a simple one – please rejoin the world. It is where you all belong, not in some self created imaginary citadel. The present path you are on leads nowhere. Do it for all the children

    • Jarred

      You just posted a steaming pile of Horse-Sheeet…..

    • Jarred

      There is no occupation you can’t occupy your own ancestral land…Israel is the indigenous Home of The Jewish People…End of Story….

  • Steven

    Israel should announce that it will welcome Amnesty International back into its territory only when AI cleans up its act.

    A second announcement is that Israel will respect the UN only when the UN begins to abide by its charter.