Saturday, July 22nd | 28 Tammuz 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
December 1, 2016 1:40 pm

Analysis: Russian Silence Might Signal ‘Tacit Consent’ by Kremlin to Israeli Strikes in Syria

avatar by Barney Breen-Portnoy

Email a copy of "Analysis: Russian Silence Might Signal ‘Tacit Consent’ by Kremlin to Israeli Strikes in Syria" to a friend
Israeli Air Force F-16s fly in formation. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Israeli Air Force F-16s fly in formation. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Russia’s silence following reports that the Israeli Air Force bombed an arms depot and a Hezbollah-bound weapons convoy in Syria on Wednesday might signal “tacit consent” to such actions as long as they do not harm the Kremlin’s interests, a military reporter for the Hebrew news site Walla wrote on Thursday.

The reported IAF strike, Walla’s Amir Bohbot noted, indicated that Israel would “not hesitate in face of a tactical threat — even if this means getting very close to Russia’s sphere of operations in Syria.”

“The main message of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Russian President Vladmir Putin, if Israel was in fact responsible for the strike, was that Israel has red lines and will not permit the arming of Hezbollah,” Bohbot wrote.

Related coverage

July 22, 2017 9:30 am
0

Sarah Huckabee Sanders Named New White House Press Secretary

Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Friday was named the new White House press secretary, replacing Sean Spicer. Incoming White House communications director...

The IAF has reportedly carried out numerous strikes in Syria in recent years to prevent the transfer of advanced weaponry to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Both the Assad regime and Hezbollah are backed by Iran.

On Wednesday, IDF Brig. Gen. (res.) Yosef Kuperwasser — a former director-general of Israel’s Ministry of International Affairs and Strategy — told The Algemeiner that Iran was quickening the pace of its arms shipments to its proxies in the region due to its fear that after Donald Trump assumes the US presidency in January, its room to maneuver in Syria will be greatly hampered.

Following Russia’s entry into the Syria fray last year, the Israeli and Russian militaries established a coordination mechanism to avoid unnecessary friction.

Netanyahu has met with Putin four times since the Russian military intervention in Syria began and the two have also spoken by phone on many other occasions.

However, despite its efforts to avoid a clash with the Jewish state, Russia has been “continuing to tighten its cooperation with the axis of evil — Syria, Iran and Hezbollah,” Bohbot wrote. “One can assume that when Russian and Iranian officers and Hezbollah commanders sit around the table to coordinate militarily, they share information about Israel.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Peter Joffe

    It is far better to destroy the weapons when they are all in one place. Do not wait for them to be deployed into hundreds of different places. Of course when that happens you can be sure that these terrorists will store the weapons in homes, schools, mosques and among civilians. Tough choice for Israel but its either them or us. Trump will understand but he cannot openly support. The real answer is to destroy Islam.

Algemeiner.com