Tuesday, May 23rd | 27 Iyyar 5777

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
December 28, 2016 2:24 pm

Kerry Assails Israeli Settlements, Denies US Involvement in Last Week’s Security Council Resolution in Landmark Speech

avatar by Barney Breen-Portnoy

Email a copy of "Kerry Assails Israeli Settlements, Denies US Involvement in Last Week’s Security Council Resolution in Landmark Speech" to a friend
Secretary of State John Kerry with President Barack Obama. Photo: White House.

Secretary of State John Kerry with President Barack Obama. Photo: White House.

Ongoing Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank “risks making peace impossible” and is leading towards a one-state reality, outgoing US Secretary of State John Kerry asserted in a major policy address on Wednesday, less than a month before President-elect Donald Trump will take office.

Without a two-state solution to the conflict with the Palestinians, Kerry stated, “Israel can either be Jewish or democratic, it cannot be both, and it won’t ever really be at peace.”

“Settlement expansion,” Kerry went on to claim, “has nothing to do with Israel’s security.”

Related coverage

May 22, 2017 5:13 pm
0

Trump’s Approach of Enhanced Relations With Arab States as Key to Peace Appeals to Israelis, Experts Say

Donald Trump's vision of a Middle East peace process driven by an enhanced relationship between Israel and the Sunni Arab...

Referring to the anti-settlement UN Security Council resolution that was passed last week due to America’s abstention from the vote, Kerry said, “If we had vetoed this resolution…the United States would have been giving license to further unfettered settlement construction that we fundamentally oppose.”

Furthermore, Kerry emphasized, “We strongly reject that notion that we were somehow…the driving force behind this resolution. The Egyptians and Palestinians had long made clear to all of us, all of the international community, their intention to bring a resolution to a vote before the end of the year. And we communicated that to the Israelis…The United States did not draft or originate this resolution, nor did we put it forward.

“We did not agree with every word in this resolution,” Kerry continued. “But we could not in good conscience veto a resolution that condemns violence and incitement and reiterates what has been for a long time the overwhelming consensus and international view on settlements.”

Hours before Kerry’s speech, as reported by The Algemeiner, Trump tweeted, “Stay strong Israel, January 20th is fast approaching!”

In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tweeted, “President-elect Trump, thank you for your warm friendship and your clear-cut support for Israel!”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • “No country in the world exists today by virtue of its ‘right’.
    All countries exist today by virtue of their ability to defend themselves against those who seek their destruction

    “No Jew has the right to yield the rights of the Jewish People in
    Israel. No Jew has the authority to do so. No Jewish body has the
    authority to do so. Not even the entire Jewish People alive today has
    the right to yield any part of Israel.”

    It is the right of the Jewish People over the generations, a right
    that under no conditions can be cancelled. Even if Jews during a
    specific period proclaim they are relinquishing this right, they have
    neither the power nor the authority to deny it to future generations.
    No concession of this type is binding or obligates the Jewish People.

    Our right to the land — the entire land — exists as an eternal
    right, and we shall not yield this historic right until its full and
    complete redemption is realized.”

    *** David Ben Gurion, Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, 1937
    Less talk and more action and results.

    “In Israel; We have to undue and reverse the decades of nonsense that the peace industry has fermented, which led us to the position where the world thinks we the Jews are occupiers in our own ancestral land. If something is false and it is repeated enough times it becomes sort of common wisdom. We have to undo that.”

    Arab-Palestinians; you have to be a country first, which you are not, before you can be a country under occupation. Furthermore, the Arab-Palestinians have a State it is called Jordan which was created illegally from Jewish territory.

    The UN cannot make a country for the Arab-Palestinians. They have no such authority under the UN Charter; Moreover, The UN cannot abrogate International law and treaties. The UN is only an advisory capacity and all UN resolutions must be accepted by all the parties in writing to be valid, The Arabs did not agree, therefore the resolutions have no meaning whatsoever. Furthermore, the Arabs already have an Arab-Palestinian state. It is Jordan which is comprised of over 77% of the allocated Jewish territory after WWI when the Arabs received over 12 million sq. km. of territory with a wealth of oil reserves.
    YJ Draiman

    Local Arabs that is the name
    Reader comment on: Arab/Palestinians: Sex in Gaza City
    Submitted by YJ Draiman, Jun 1, 2016 11:32
    Local Arabs is the description of the Arabs in what was formerly known as the region of Palestine, which is the Land of Israel. It is an insult and it is promoting the perpetration of a fraud by calling the local Arabs nothing else than local Arabs. Prior to the mid sixties they were called Arabs all of a sudden they woke up one morning and decided in order to promote their fraud and deception to assume the title the Jews had since the Romans renamed the Land of Israel Palestine and Jerusalem Aelia Capitolina.
    YJ Draiman

Algemeiner.com