Sunday, October 22nd | 2 Heshvan 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 17, 2017 8:07 am

Will Trump Bow to Arab Intimidation on Jerusalem?

avatar by Mitchell Bard

Email a copy of "Will Trump Bow to Arab Intimidation on Jerusalem?" to a friend
The US Embassy in Tel Aviv. Photo: Wiki Commons.

The US Embassy in Tel Aviv. Photo: Wiki Commons.

President-elect Donald Trump has promised to move the US Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Predictably, cataclysmic warnings are coming from the Palestinians, Arab leaders and State Department Arabists.

For nearly 60 years, American presidents have wilted in the face of these threats. Will Trump be different? As someone who has up until now refused to back down from bullies, or to feel obligated to conventional wisdom, Trump — one hopes — will fulfill his promise.

The US Embassy is sovereign American territory. Since when do we let foreigners dictate where American sovereignty begins and ends? Jerusalem is the only place over which blackmailers have succeeded in limiting our independence. Out of the 190 nations with which America has diplomatic relations, Israel is the only one whose capital is not recognized by the US government. It is long past time to put an end to this absurd anomaly.

The fact that there is any hesitancy to move the embassy is itself a colossal US policy failure, and a glaring example of executive spinelessness. Where else does the US let its policy be dictated by threats of violence? Giving in to blackmail from terrorists only emboldens them, and in the case of Jerusalem, they’ve learned that whipping up hysteria, and periodically resorting to violence, is sufficient to cow the world’s only superpower.

Related coverage

October 20, 2017 1:51 pm
0

Hamas Supporter to Receive Award From Harvard Student Group

He has publicly endorsed Hamas, and secretly schemed with Hamas' supporters to thwart US-led peace efforts in the Middle East. Now Nihad Awad is preparing for a prestigious...

With everything that’s happening in the Middle East, does anyone really believe that the Muslim world is going to get upset over the moving of the US Embassy 40 miles down the road and acknowledging the fact that Jerusalem has been Israel’s capital since independence, and will remain so in perpetuity?

Is ISIS, which is now fighting for its survival in Syria and Iraq, going to send soldiers to fight a jihad for Jerusalem? Are the Sunnis and Shiites, who slaughter each on a daily basis in a death match for regional supremacy, going to be distracted by the American flag flying over a building in Jerusalem? Will the Gulf States that face Iran’s hegemonic ambitions turn on the country that they need most to keep their royal heads on their shoulders?

And will the US move spark another intifada? Not likely.

First, Israel is much better prepared for the outbreak of violence than it was in the past.

Second, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has been trying to stir up Muslim anger by regularly accusing Israel of threatening the Al-Aqsa Mosque — and has failed.

Third, an escalation of terror will undermine the already unconvincing case that Palestinians are ready for statehood, and that Israel should capitulate to their demands.

Fourth, if an intifada breaks out, Israelis who lost interest in territorial compromise after the Gaza disengagement brought terror rather than peace, will be even more reluctant to support any withdrawal from the West Bank.

Fifth, an uprising will reinforce the belief that the Palestinians cannot be trusted to keep the peace even after an agreement because they will use any excuse to turn to violence.

The reactions to Palestinian threats regarding the embassy parallel those of Kerry and his predecessors to Palestinian irredentism. Rather than tell the Palestinians that we will not tolerate any violence, and that we will punish them if they do not heed our warning, our feckless diplomats convince their political bosses that we must give in to their demands. Usually, what follows is pressure on Israel to make concessions to appease Palestinian anger.

President Trump needs to take the same tough line that he has expressed toward the United Nations after its reprehensible adoption of yet another anti-Israel measure last month. He should let the Palestinians and other leaders in the region know that no economic or military aid will be forthcoming to anyone who in any way threatens our embassy in Jerusalem. An attack on the embassy is an attack on the United States, he should tell them, and will trigger a military response not only against the perpetrators but the organizations or governments behind them.

By moving the embassy, President Trump can send a strong message that America will once again behave like a superpower. We will no longer lead from behind. The simple act of moving our ambassador down the road from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem will show that, unlike President Obama, Trump cannot be blackmailed or intimidated, and that Iran, Russia, Syria, China, the Palestinians and our other enemies will no longer be allowed to ignore or threaten our interests.

Dr. Mitchell Bard is the author/editor of 24 books including the 2017 edition of Myths and Facts: A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict; The Arab Lobby, and the novel After Anatevka: Tevye in Palestine.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Joseph Feld

    Ask any Israeli Jew or Israeli Arab or Arab in East Jerusalem and they will acknowledge that the capital of Israel is Jerusalem, even if it may some day also be the capital of Palestine. Jerusalem has the Israeli Parliament, Supreme Court, President, Prime Minister and Chief Rabbinate. Can you imagine telling any other country that its eternal capital is invalid ? Jerusalem’s role as the historical, religious, cultural and political centre of the Jewish people long predates the UN and goes back to the days of King David and his son King Solomon’s Temple about 3,000 years ago. Of the Mandate for Palestine as the area of the renewed Jewish hational homeland 77% was taken away for create the new Kingdom of Jordan on the East Bank to reward an Arabic dynasty that supported the UK in WW1. The remaining 23% of the Mandate should have become the Jewish national homeland, but in 1948 Jordan invaded and captured East Jerusalem and the West Bank, ethnically cleansing the Jews and trying to destroy thousands of years of Jewish history. In 1967 Israel defeated Jordan and took back Jerusalem and the West Bank, allowing Jews to return to their homes from which they had been forced out. Only two countries ever accepted Jordan’s claim to Jerusalem and the West Bank. When the 6 Day War was over the UN wanted victorious Israel to ‘return’ the land captured. BUT to whom could it be returned? Jordan was rejected. The previous power, the British Mandate had expired and the Ottoman Turkish Empire no longer existed beyond the boundaries of Turkey itself. The Jews had been given back their own Land!

Algemeiner.com