Monday, November 20th | 2 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
October 17, 2017 2:23 pm

Hamas’ Promise to End Terror Is Seen as ‘Highly Unlikely’

avatar by Adam Abrams / JNS.org

Email a copy of "Hamas’ Promise to End Terror Is Seen as ‘Highly Unlikely’" to a friend

Hamas fighters. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.org – Under the new unity deal brokered last week between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) ruling Fatah party, Hamas reportedly agreed to cease all terror attacks against Israelis.

The London-based Arabic daily newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat reported that the unity deal is conditioned upon the rival factions making joint decisions on key issues, such as declarations of war and the signing of any final status agreement to resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

The deal contains “an implicit understanding” that Hamas will not carry out terrorism against Israel from either Gaza or the PA-controlled territories, given that terror attacks could provoke a new round of conflict with Israel, Palestinian sources reportedly told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Former PA Foreign Minister Ashraf al-Ajrami — a close confidante of PA President Mahmoud Abbas — told Israel Radio last week that the Egyptian government conditioned the successful enactment of the unity deal upon Hamas implementing a cease-fire with Israel.

Related coverage

November 17, 2017 2:44 pm
0

US Lawmakers Advance Measures to Block Aid to Hamas

The House Foreign Affairs Committee approved legislation on Wednesday targeting the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. The approved measures include the Palestinian International Terrorism Support Prevention...

Yet Daniel Pipes, the president of the Middle East Forum, expressed doubt that Hamas would alter its activities.

“Hamas emerged 30 years ago to represent a more Islamist and harder-line approach against Israel, which it has since consistently sustained,” according to Pipes. “For it to give up its tactics and adopt those of Fatah-Palestinian Authority at this late date strikes me as highly unlikely. I expect the PA-Hamas competition will continue until one of them disappears, most likely the PA. Therefore, I expect Hamas operations in the West Bank to continue.”

Professor Joshua Teitelbaum, a senior research fellow at Israel’s Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, said that Hamas “has agreed to cooperate with the PA due to Egyptian pressure and because it is in dire financial straits.”

“In the past, there have been few Hamas attacks from the West Bank, so to stop them would not be a major change in policy. [Hamas] does not want to run afoul of the PA,” Teitelbaum told JNS.org.

According to Israeli media reports, Hamas purportedly set its own conditions to form a unity government, including demanding that the PA stop arresting Hamas members in the disputed territories.

The agreement will see Fatah lift a number of punitive sanctions that it imposed on Hamas-ruled Gaza in return for the formation of a unity government beginning on December 1. This would pave the way for the PA to return to Gaza, where Hamas seized power in 2007. The deal also allows for the joint administration of the coastal territory’s borders.

The Israeli government reacted to the announcement of the Palestinian unity deal by calling on Hamas to disarm and recognize Israel.

“Any reconciliation between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas must include honoring international agreements and the [Middle East] Quartet conditions, first and foremost among them, recognizing Israel and disarming Hamas,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

Additionally, Israel called on Hamas to release the two Israeli civilians that the terror group is holding in captivity — Avera Mengistu and Hisham al-Sayed — as well as to return the remains of fallen IDF soldiers Oron Shaul and Hadar Goldin.

“Two interpretations of Israel’s response [to the unity deal] exist: the exoteric, which takes the Netanyahu government’s condemnation of the reconciliation at face value; and the esoteric, which claims that Jerusalem is feigning anger over the accord,” Pipes said. “I find the esoteric reasoning tortuous — it assumes that Hamas can be turned into a version of the PA — and therefore see the government of Israel [as] hostile to this accord.”

Since their bloody split in 2007, Hamas and Fatah have tried to reconcile numerous times, with the latest attempt occurring in 2014. Despite the new deal, a number of outstanding issues remain between the rival factions, including future elections and the dismantling of Hamas’ “military wing.”

Amid the negotiations leading up to the agreement, Abbas demanded that Hamas disarm itself and dismantle its armed brigades before transferring control of Gaza to the PA. Yet senior Hamas member Mousa Abu Marzook recently stated that the issue of dismantling the terror group’s military was not up for negotiation.

According to a statement by Egypt’s State Information Service, the Palestinian factions “agreed on procedures” for the reconciliation agreement, but there are still “divisions between the two sides.” Egypt will host another Hamas-Fatah meeting on November 21.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com