Saturday, April 20th | 15 Nisan 5779

November 30, 2017 11:01 am

AMP Convention Sees Opportunities in US Elections

avatar by Steven Emerson

Email a copy of "AMP Convention Sees Opportunities in US Elections" to a friend

Capitol Hill. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

One of America’s most visible anti-Israel groups spent Thanksgiving weekend engaged in some magical thinking — and planning to change America’s political landscape.

American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) has long rejected Israel and turned a blind eye to the ways that terrorism from groups like Hamas and Fatah actually make life worse for average Palestinians. This behavior is consistent with an organization that has documented links to a defunct Hamas-support network in the United States.

The recent AMP convention, held in Chicago, marked the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration — Britain’s endorsement of “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” Several speakers spoke of demanding a British apology. Other speakers claimed that the effort to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel (BDS) is hurting the country’s economy, that the media is slanted toward Israel and that Iran is not as big a source of regional mischief compared to Israel.

But the broader focus was on next year’s US elections, and a belief that a better organized Palestinian movement can dramatically change American policy.

Related coverage

April 19, 2019 12:38 pm

Alan Dershowitz Should Come Clean About Qatar

Alan Dershowitz published a blistering response to my column asking him why he was publicly pressuring Israel to create a...

Polling indicates that younger liberals are increasingly more supportive of the Palestinian cause than of Israel, Josh Ruebner told a session on campaigning. Ruebner, the policy director for the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, said that this change in attitude can lead directly to changes in America’s Middle East policy.

Politicians “pay attention to these polls. They also pay attention to a poll last year by the Brookings Institution which found that 60 percent … of all Democrats supported sanctioning Israel,” he said. “So when we see all these politicians trying to pass these laws to punish us, to criminalize us for engaging in Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaigns, we only have to point to the fact that the majority of the base of the Democratic Party supports those efforts.”

Ahlam Jbara, the former interim director for the Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago — who worked with the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign — described an increased emphasis that Palestinians received during the election cycle. “It was on the radar because organizations like AMP, the US Campaign and others made a really big push to make sure that Jerusalem is on the platform. Right? You had Bernie Sanders say Palestinians have human rights, Palestinians have the right to exist, Palestinians have the right to clean water.”

Jbara’s Facebook page icon features her pictured with convicted Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh, who was deported from the United States in September after being convicted of naturalization fraud. When she applied to become a US citizen, Odeh failed to disclose her conviction for a 1969 Jerusalem supermarket bombing that killed two university students. Her cause was embraced by anti-Israel groups, including AMP.

During the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Palestinian advocates came close to changing the party platform in their favor. That result was thwarted by “the highers-up,” said Milwaukee attorney Othman Atta, a former director of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee. “So, we need to change the leadership at the top,” he told the AMP convention, “because these people are just like the elites that are doing whatever they want. We need to have more grassroots effort. And as Muslims, we need to be involved.”

In 2011, Atta dismissed the US terrorist designations for Hamas and Hezbollah as “a political decision,” and wondered why Israel was not similarly labeled.

Other speakers cast most Palestinians as innocent, passive victims, too impotent to be engaged in “conflict” with Israel, with their story misrepresented by a media that they say favors Israel.

“I travel to Palestine and Israel, and I discovered there is no Palestinian-Israeli conflict,” Florida political activist Manal Fakhoury said. “None. Zero. Zilch. Diddly-squat. I can say with confidence that Palestinians have no agency. The Israeli government controls everything. Currently there is no conflict. Only the omnipresent power of Israel and people trying to resist it.”

This position, of course, pretends that Hamas terrorists in Gaza have not launched thousands of rockets into Israel and diverted money that could be used to build the territory’s infrastructure and improve the quality of life in order to invest in re-arming and building attack tunnels for its terrorists.

Fakhoury also seemed to equate the Nazi Holocaust, which claimed 6 million Jewish lives as part of a “Final Solution” to eliminate Jews from the planet, with the Palestinian Nakba, or “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 creation.

When her daughter was in middle school, Fakhoury explained, she texted her mother to say the class was learning about the Holocaust. Was it okay, her daughter asked, to ask the teacher why the class wasn’t also learning about the Nakba? The teacher didn’t know anything about it, but Fakhoury said that her daughter was allowed to make a presentation the following week.

“We need to tell our story,” Fakhoury said.

The media fails to tell the Palestinian story, said Ahlam Muhtaseb, a media studies professor and interim director for California State University, San Bernardino’s Center for Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies. She portrayed coverage of the last Gaza war as slanted in Israel’s favor.

Israel was “genociding (sic) against the people in Gaza. You can’t really hide that,” she said.

“CNN for the first week, all it did is repeat Israeli propaganda, official narrative of what’s happening in Gaza,” Muhtaseb said. “Firstly, the dominance, infatuation of Israeli officials or Israeli spokesperson in the United States or you know those kinds of sources were just dominant. You did not see any Palestinian voice.”

Genocide is the “deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political or cultural group.” Palestinian sources say that 2,300 people died during the 2014 war. Many of them turned out to be Hamas fighters. But even if you accept that the number is accurate, it is nowhere near a genocide.

Muhtaseb also overlooked the extraordinary effort by Israeli officials to minimize civilian casualties, including advanced warnings by flyers and in direct telephone calls for civilians to leave a targeted area before the bombs fell.

“I believe that … everything the IDF does to protect civilians and to stop the death of innocent civilians is a great deal more than any other army, and it’s more than the British and the American armies,” Colonel (ret.) Richard Kemp CBE, the former commander of the British armed forces in Afghanistan, said in 2014.

Much of the reporting during the Gaza wars has been heavily slanted toward the Palestinian narrative. Many news outlets never reported Hamas threats to journalists, who in turn feared reporting on Hamas rocket fire from areas surrounded by civilians. Reporters acknowledged this after they left Gaza.

Other programs at the AMP event focused on concern over legislation in several states and similar legislation proposed in Washington to thwart the BDS movement.

The legislation essentially creates a state boycott of any business that boycotts Israel — due to the inherently antisemitic nature of the boycott movement. While BDS campaigns on college campuses have won support from student bodies, they have failed to persuade officials responsible for school endowments from withdrawing investments in companies doing business in Israel.

But AMP Associate Director of Outreach & Grassroots Organizing Taher Herzallah, who in 2014 justified Hamas rocket fire into Israel and called images of wounded Israeli soldiers “the most beautiful sight,” painted a picture of BDS success crippling Israel’s economy.

“Over the past 12 years we’ve seen banks, labor unions, artists, governments such as South Africa, companies, academic associations, student groups and religious institutions take formal positions to withdraw their investments from, cancel shows in or boycott the Zionist regime,” he said. “There’s been marked success with billions of dollars of investments threatened, to the point that the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs has dedicated an immense amount of resources fighting what it calls the delegitimization of Israel through BDS.”

While imperfect, Israel’s economy has been thriving, drawing 15 percent of global venture-capital investment to its burgeoning tech sector.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism has also demonstrated how blind hate toward Israel drives Palestinian advocates to make outlandish claims and faulty analyses. Just last week, AMP National Chairman Hatem Bazian had to apologize for retweeting antisemitic cartoons. In each, the message was that Jews get away with things that others cannot.

AMP convention speakers, including Bazian, were influenced by that blind hate when discussing indications that a new US peace initiative could include regional partners as part of an alliance against Iran’s dangerous and expanding influence.

Two senior AMP officials described opposition to Iran as misguided or perhaps disproportionate. National Chairman Hatem Bazian described the situation for Palestinian advocates as “very dark … we are in the lowest period in our political history and power. Not only do we have to deal with Israel’s occupation, we have to deal with the Arab world. They have turned around thinking that Iran is the biggest threat and they’re just cooking to think about Iran. And they have an Arab summit which is silence toward Palestine. … It is difficult.”

Several countries threatened by Iran, including Saudi Arabia, have been moving towards better relations with Israel.

Iran’s military support may be the only reason that Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad has survived, at a cost of war crimes and mass killings that have been enabled by Iran and its Lebanese proxy, Hezbollah. Iran is also stoking violence in Yemen by arming Houthi rebels as it seeks to establish its regional dominance. Bazian, a University of California, Berkeley faculty member, placed the need to protect Palestinian intransigence as more important.

At least AMP National Policy Director Osama Abuirshaid acknowledged that he’s “not a fan of Iran,” before finding fault with Sunni states who see the Islamic Republic as an enemy.

“But to go against Iran by justifying the Israeli crimes and normalizing them, this is appalling,” he said. “So now Iran is the enemy. Saudi Arabia and UAE, they want Israel to be their ally against Iran.”

No speaker during the three-day convention spoke about ways that Palestinians and their advocates might make conditions better for peace. None talked about finding ways to engage with supporters of Israel to find a way forward — or to cease terrorism and incitement to violence.

The one Israeli voice present, Miko Peled, is a staunch anti-Zionist who wore a BDS badge. He won applause when he described the goal of the popular resistance as a freeing all of Palestine. He even contested using the name Israel: “The country must be called by its name, and its name is Palestine.”

In September, Peled seemed to question the Holocaust and to equate Israelis with Nazis when he addressed Britain’s Labour party. Free speech, he said, includes “the freedom to criticize and to discuss every issue, whether it’s the Holocaust: yes or no, Palestine, the liberation, the whole spectrum.”

In a video appearance, former Palestinian parliamentarian Mustafa Barghouti, a leader in the BDS movement, described the demands that all Palestinian factions insist upon: A state with “Jerusalem as its capital, and … the right of every refugee to come back to their towns and villages that they were displaced from.” Barghouti, and all Palestinian advocates, know that a “right of return” could swamp Israel with people who call themselves refugees, but who are two and three generations removed from setting foot there. The resulting demographic change would cost the country its Jewish majority, effectively giving Palestinians the one-state solution they want.

AMP’s rhetoric was somewhat toned down, but it’s ultimate message remains the same: It has no interest in peaceful co-existence.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner