Saturday, July 21st | 9 Av 5778

March 19, 2018 12:04 pm

The Trump Administration Just Doesn’t Get Gaza

avatar by Stephen M. Flatow /

Email a copy of "The Trump Administration Just Doesn’t Get Gaza" to a friend

An Israeli soldier stands near a military jeep next to the border fence with the southern Gaza Strip, in Nir Oz, Israel. Photo: Reuters / Amir Cohen. – Last week’s conference by the Trump administration on the situation in the Gaza Strip  “focused on the need for the Palestinian Authority to take control over Gaza,” a White House official told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. If that report is accurate, it means that the United States still doesn’t understand the basic problem in Gaza — or how to solve it.

The idea that Hamas is the “bad guy” and that the Palestinian Authority (PA) is the “good guy” is a fallacy that began with the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993, and is still the mindset of too many people in Washington.

The attempts to distinguish between the “moderate” PA and the “extremist” Hamas always foundered on the reality that the PA regards Hamas as its brother, not its enemy. Brothers may quarrel from time to time — they may get into a scuffle now and then, or even try to kill each other — but they remain brothers.

The PA leadership promised, as part of Oslo, to disband all terrorist groups, seize their weapons and outlaw them — in short, to put them out of business. But here we are, 25 years later, and Hamas still has active terrorist cells throughout the PA-controlled parts of Judea and Samaria.

Related coverage

July 20, 2018 12:04 pm

France’s Reputation Is at Stake Again Over the Murder of Sarah Halimi - For the second time in 20 years, France basked in the accomplishment of winning the World Cup with...

There’s no doubt that the PA has the means to eliminate Hamas in the territories; it has one of the largest per-capita security forces in the world. Yet it has never even outlawed Hamas. It has never made a real effort to capture its members or confiscate its weapons. It has not extradited a single Hamas terrorist to Israel, even though the Oslo agreement obligates it to do so.

Even The New York Times, a longtime cheerleader for the PA, has occasionally conceded that Hamas and other terrorists roam free in PA-run cities. On March 23, 2014, the Times reported that Israeli troops were forced to enter the Jenin refugee camp in pursuit of terrorists because although Jenin is under the “full control” of the Palestinian Authority, “the Palestinian [security forces] did not generally operate in refugee camps.”

When the PA’s newspapers, television and radio outlets glorify terrorists as “martyrs” and “heroes,” they don’t talk about only Fatah terrorists. They glorify Hamas murderers, too.

When the PA pays salaries to imprisoned terrorists and the families of dead terrorists, they don’t give out the payments only to Fatah members. They pay Hamas murderers and their families, too.

So there’s no reason for surprise that the PA boycotted last week’s conference on Gaza in Washington. No matter how hard the State Department crowd wishes it, the PA is not going to fight Hamas for control of Gaza. In fact, it’s not going to fight Hamas at all.

The solution to Gaza’s various ills is not to pump more international money into the region. That has been tried for decades, and it hasn’t worked. The solution is regime change. But a change from Hamas to the PA — even if it were possible and even if the PA were amenable to that –would not represent genuine change. It would mean replacing one corrupt, violent Palestinian dictatorship with another corrupt, violent Palestinian dictatorship.

Not every group of people with a grievance deserves, or is ready for, self-rule. Some have too little experience with the culture of democracy to establish and run a free society; the last thing that the world needs is more dictatorships. Some territories are too violent to live in peace with their neighbors; that is the danger that Israel faces.

For years, advocates of Palestinian statehood urged Israel to grant self-rule to the Arabs in Gaza. They claimed that if the Gazans were allowed to rule themselves, they would become peaceful neighbors since surely they wouldn’t want to risk losing their self-rule. It would be an experiment to see if giving them a fully sovereign state could succeed. Yitzhak Rabin and Ariel Sharon decided to take that risk.

The tens of thousands of rockets fired from Gaza at Israel over the years have demonstrated that the experiment was an abject failure. Gaza proves that the Palestinian Arabs are not yet ready for self-rule. Neither conferences in Washington nor handouts from the international community will change that.

Stephen M. Flatow, a vice president of the Religious Zionists of America, is an attorney in New Jersey. He is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • David in Israel

    The difference between the PLO and Hamas you cite – that Hamas is “extreme[ly] religious” is actually a ‘distinction without a difference.’ It’s irrelevant that the PLO is more secular. The PLO never shies away from sharing their goal with the world – to paraphrase, ‘to drive the Jews into the sea.’ Further, your claim that the PLO is “actually trying to achieve a Palestinian state” would be laughable were it not de rigueur among the elite and had not the consequences been so costly in terms of Jewish blood spilled to date.
    I don’t even know where to start with the rest of what you say. It is riddled with error, from the bases of your arguments to their conclusions. Learn a little about Islam before you write again, please. Islam can never accept any equitable peace – they must be on top (or bottom). It doesn’t matter if they’re “completely secular” or “fanatically religious;” it’s the culture, the way of life. No “leader” can thus ever be found that will lead them toward anything like an equitable peace – with any other, non-Islamic people.
    You would know all this simply by observation if you would learn how to view the world objectively and learn to employ critical thinking. Go forth and learn – then come back and comment.