Friday, April 19th | 12 Nisan 5784

Subscribe
May 23, 2018 2:45 pm
0

Abbas and the Arab States vs. Hamas

× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

avatar by Yoni Ben Menachem / JNS.org

Opinion

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas heads a Palestinian cabinet meeting in the West Bank city of Ramallah, July 28, 2013. Photo: Reuters / Issam Rimawi / Pool / File.

JNS.org The Hamas “Return March” campaign in Gaza, which began on March 30 and continued on a weekly basis each Friday, has exposed what is really happening in the Gaza Strip. The Gazans, led by Hamas, are fighting at the border fence against the Israeli restrictions that have gone on for 11 years. But the Palestinian Authority and Arab states have abandoned them, in effect giving Israel the “green light” to deal with Hamas-engineered Palestinian violence as it sees fit.

PA leader Mahmoud Abbas does not conceal his attitude toward Hamas. Two weeks ago, he and his adviser Mahmoud Habbash accused the Hamas leadership of sending Gaza residents to their deaths at the border.

Abbas achieved new legitimacy at a recent gathering of the Palestinian National Council (PNC) in Ramallah and he is waiting for the end of Hamas’ “Return March” campaign to renew his efforts to take fresh control of the Gaza Strip.

Several months ago, Abbas imposed strict sanctions on Gaza, including stopping salaries to local government workers, which aggravated the humanitarian crisis in the area. His plan, directed by head of Palestinian intelligence in the West Bank Gen. Majid Faraj, was to incite the Gazan population against Hamas. However, the plan boomeranged, and Hamas managed to channel the anger on the street against Mahmoud Abbas himself.

Abbas’ reserve plan is that as soon as the “Return March” campaign is over, he will issue the Hamas leadership with an ultimatum to hand over all government authority and weapons in Gaza to the PA. If the Hamas leadership refuses, Gaza will be declared “a rebellious province” with all of the implications of this designation.

The last time that armies from the Arab countries fought on behalf of the Palestinians was 70 years ago during the War of Independence. Today, the Arab regimes are more involved with their own domestic issues and maintaining the stability of their governments.

These countries have issued many statements and condemnations of Israel’s conduct towards the demonstrators at the Gaza border fence. However, beyond this, they have not done anything practical.

Kuwait attempted to whip up condemnation of Israel at the UN Security Council by proposing a draft statement, though the United States was bound to veto it. After the height of the Gaza border campaign on May 14 and 15, when more than 60 Palestinians — most of them terrorists — were killed and as many as 2,000 others injured, the Arab League gathered in Cairo at the foreign ministry level only to discuss the transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem.

More relevant to the Arab leaders than the Palestinian problem is their own fear of Iran and the danger of ISIS terrorism. Although the Palestinians have completely rejected Donald Trump’s “Deal of the Century” before it has even been presented, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are attempting to convince Abbas to agree to evaluate the plan.

The more moderate Sunni countries believe that getting closer to Israel behind the scenes is a sure way to get closer to the Trump administration. They are worried about the exposure of their true connections with Israel, but are prepared for normalization as soon as this becomes possible.

The Arab countries are careful to outwardly emphasize the “legitimate rights” of the Palestinians and even though they have not rejected Trump’s “deal of the century,” they say that a solution to the Palestinian problem needs to be found in accordance with the Arab peace initiative. They are simply playing a double, hypocritical game. The Palestinians know this very well and they don’t believe these declarations of support.

Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain are working hard against the Hamas leadership in Gaza. From their point of view, Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, which is subverting Arab regimes.

Bahrain’s Foreign Minister Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa expressed support for Israel when it attacked Iranian targets in Syria on May 10. Writing on his Arabic Twitter account, he declared: “As long as Iran continues the current status quo of its forces and rockets operating in the region, then any country, including Israel, has the right to defend itself by eliminating the source of danger.”

Bahrain is aware of the relationship between Hamas and Iran. It perceives Iran and its satellites as a threat. In Bahrain, the Sunni royal family rules over a Shiite majority, and it put down a Shiite insurgency during the Arab Spring in 2011. Bahrain has condemned Israel over recent events at the Gaza Strip, but Hamas is calling this mere “lip service.”

Egypt also sees Hamas as a terrorist organization. Egypt participated in an embargo on Gaza by closing the Rafah border crossing for most of the year. However, it has been compelled to change direction toward Hamas because it wants quiet in northern Sinai following ISIS terror activity there. Hamas assisted ISIS with its terrorist activities in Egypt, but Egypt has reached an understanding with Hamas on this issue.

The newspaper Al-Araby Al-Jadeed reported on May 16 that Egyptian intelligence instructed senior media figures in Egypt not to attack a Hamas delegation when it arrived for a very brief visit, in order to prevent the outbreak of demonstrations in Cairo and other Arab capitals. To calm the situation, Egypt announced that the Rafah crossing would remain open until further notice, and that it would allow the entry of all kinds of products into the Gaza Strip.

Qatar, which hosts senior officials of the Muslim Brotherhood in its capital Doha, is Hamas’ greatest supporter and has good connections with Iran.

Jordan is very suspicious of Hamas and is afraid that the “Return March” campaign will weaken the stability of the Hashemite kingdom, where millions of Palestinians are currently living. At the same time, Jordan has held a special status at the holy sites in Jerusalem since the peace agreement with Israel in 1994 and is concerned that Trump’s new diplomatic plan may affect this status. Therefore, it is working closely with the PA to torpedo the US peace plan.

The current round of violence in the Gaza Strip is expected to go on for another few weeks or maybe even longer if the Hamas leadership decides to turn it into a kind of new intifada. The Arab countries do not intend to do anything to help Hamas make its campaign a success. They are satisfied with issuing statements and condemnations, but they are avoiding any arguments with Israel and the Trump administration.

The PA hopes that Hamas will fail and not achieve anything against Israel. Abbas has received new legitimacy from the PNC, and he wants to bring down Hamas and destroy any chance for it to claim that it is the true representative of the Palestinian people.

Hamas, therefore, remains (almost) alone. The concern is that if it feels pushed to the wall and too isolated, it may create a security escalation in the Gaza Strip to reshuffle the cards and change the situation.

Yoni Ben Menachem, a veteran Arab affairs and diplomatic commentator for Israel Radio and Television, is a senior Middle East analyst for the Jerusalem Center. He served as director general and chief editor of the Israel Broadcasting Authority. This article was originally published by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.