Sunday, November 17th | 19 Heshvan 5780

November 15, 2018 1:22 pm

Is the Situation in Gaza the ‘Problem from Hell’?

avatar by Israel Kasnett /


Former Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman. Photo: Reuters / Ronen Zvulun.

JNS.orgAvigdor Lieberman announced that he was stepping down as defense minister on Wednesday, in protest of what he called the Israeli government’s “capitulation to terror.” His decision came after the security cabinet decided to pursue a ceasefire with Hamas in the wake of the terror group’s rocket barrage on southern Israel.

Lieberman has long been a loud and vocal advocate of hitting Hamas hard militarily, and he accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of buying short-term quiet at the expense of severe “long-term damage to national security.”

Like everything in Israel, a million opinions churn over what Israel should be doing in Gaza. Wipe out the entire Hamas leadership? Bomb the Strip indiscriminately? Open all the crossings and lift restrictions on all materials and goods? Everyone has an idea, especially when Hamas attacks Israel, and Israel’s response appears muted.

Jonathan Schanzer, senior vice president of research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said that “everything that typically works [elsewhere] doesn’t necessarily work in the Gaza Strip. It’s kind of a tinderbox. One match can set everything ablaze.”

Related coverage

November 15, 2019 11:24 am

The Democratic Party Faces a Choice on Israel

A few years ago, it would have been unimaginable: the Democratic Party, the party supported by the overwhelming majority of...

“There are always two competing forces when we look at these flare-ups,” he continued. “There is Israel’s desire to maintain calm, thinking of the well-being of its own people, and then there is the military interest in preventing this buildup. There is a constant push and pull within the IDF, intelligence services, and the Prime Minister’s office.”

“So,” he added, “when an unforeseen event takes place, or when Hamas fires rockets at Israel, the military establishment needs to look around the table and decide if there is enough … to require a response. Are there enough targets threatening Israel long-term to require a response? This has been the precipitating factor. Iron Dome gives the military and government the freedom to make these decisions. That’s why most of the time, they can sit back and make these decisions in a rather calm way.”

At the recent Jerusalem Institute for Strategic Studies (JISS) conference held last month at the Begin Center in Jerusalem, former national security adviser Yaakov Amidror told the audience, perhaps prophetically, that “a war in Gaza will only benefit [Palestinian Authority leader] Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas] and Iran. And we don’t want to give Iran any gifts.”

He also warned that the government should not follow public opinion: “Governments must assess the situation coldly and not take into account what the mob — the people — think. If the government follows the public, it will make bad decisions. … The government must make the decisions for the people.”

Some experts, however, do appear to side more with the public than with Netanyahu and his government regarding the recent events in Gaza.

Writing in Hayom, Efraim Inbar, president of the JISS, said: “We cannot trust Hamas to keep the calm. Only when Hamas is afraid of IDF retaliation, which has yet to come, will calm prevail. Israelis tend to overlook the fact that in the Middle East, it is fear, above everything else, that governs how people act. Unfortunately, from time to time, we must give our enemies a violent reminder, lest they continue terrorizing us. … Extortion that leads to an ‘agreement’ is a prelude to more extortion.”

But Israel is not alone in its fight. The United States is also taking steps to curb terrorism, and has set its sights on top Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists. Just this week, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Michael Evanoff announced new measures that the US government is taking against Hezbollah and Hamas, by offering a $5 million reward for the capture of Khalil Yusif Harb, Saleh al-Arouri, or Haytham ‘Ali Tabataba’i under its Rewards for Justice Program.

Saleh al-Arouri is considered responsible for helping to start the 2014 war against Israel, in part by planning the kidnapping and subsequent killing of three Israeli teenagers.

According to, the US Department of the Treasury designated all three as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, pursuant to Executive Order 13224.

The questions lingering in everyone’s minds are: “At the end of the day, what can Israel do about Hamas? And what does Hamas really want?”

“There is a fatigue with Gaza,” said Schanzer, referring to Israel’s government. “They’ve tried everything: overwhelming force, negotiations, working with Egypt, exploring non-conventional means of delivering aid. None of these things are working. There is a resignation that Gaza is a problem from hell.”

Israel Kasnett is a writer for JNS.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.