Monday, June 24th | 21 Sivan 5779

Subscribe
March 13, 2019 9:03 am

CAIR’s Damaging Influence Evident in Ilhan Omar Controversy

avatar by Benjamin Baird

Opinion

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.). Photo: Leopaltik1242/Wikimedia Commons.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) took the opportunity last week to applaud a watered-down version of a House resolution originally intended to condemn Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN)’s recent spate of antisemitic outbursts. Instead, the legislative measure emphasized both antisemitism and “anti-Muslim discrimination and bigotry,” effectively excusing Omar’s disgraceful behavior.

CAIR said it “welcome[d] changes to the resolution” that never directly mentioned Omar or her very specific examples of antisemitism, but offered a condemnation of bigotry in general. To the self-described “Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization,” Thursday’s anti-hate proclamation represents a political triumph earned from years of demonizing Israel while promoting an overblown Islamophobia crisis.

CAIR officials took a victory lap following the resolution’s passage, absolving Omar of any wrongdoing by conflating her antisemitic statements with “legitimate criticism” of US support for Israel.

“All Americans should support statements denouncing anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and other forms of bigotry,” CAIR’s press release reads. “Unfortunately, this resolution was introduced to silence legitimate criticism of domestic support for the discriminatory and segregationist policies of a foreign government that receives billions of American taxpayer dollars.”

Related coverage

June 24, 2019 5:30 am
0

Under Siege, Iran Reverts to Its Old Tricks

JNS.org - It is doubtful that officials in Tehran feel like popping open a bottle of champagne following reports that...

Despite presenting itself as an innocuous Muslim civil rights organization, records show that CAIR was created as part of a Hamas-support network in America. Hamas is a Muslim Brotherhood legacy group that openly seeks Israel’s destruction. The FBI severed formal relations with CAIR in 2008, saying that the group was not “an appropriate liaison partner” until it could determine “whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS.”

That policy remains in effect. The United Arab Emirates, meanwhile, designated CAIR as a terrorist group in 2014.

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, (D-MI), who was accused of antisemitism in January for saying that senators opposed to the anti-Israel boycott movement “forget what country they represent,” joined Omar in celebrating the revised resolution: “Today is historic on many fronts. It’s the first time we have voted on a resolution condemning anti-Muslim bigotry in our nation’s history.”

Likewise, the day before the resolution passed, CAIR darling Linda Sarsour complained that Congress had never defended Muslim Americans from harassment. “Democratic leadership were never swift to condemn … or put out resolutions condemning islamophobia (sic) and/or standing in solidarity with Muslims on the record in Congress,” Sarsour wrote.

That’s not true. Congress has introduced several resolutions condemning Islamophobia since September 11, 2001. In October 2003, the House passed H.R. 234, “Condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, South Asia-Americans, and Sikh-Americans.” It called on law enforcement agencies “to work vigorously to prevent discriminatory backlash crimes” against these groups following the deadliest terrorist attack in US history.

The Senate adopted a similar measure that same year, and in 2015, the House introduced H.R. 569, “Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States,” after groups like CAIR warned of an impending anti-Muslim backlash following the jihadist-inspired San Bernardino massacre. Apart from a few non-violent incidents, San Bernardino residents say that their worst fears about a backlash in their own community never materialized.

The FBI’s 2017 hate crime statistics demonstrate that, like previous years, American Jews are the most common victims of hate crimes. Antisemitic attacks represent 58.1 percent of all anti-religious hate crimes — more than three times the number of anti-Muslim incidents. And yet, House lawmakers couldn’t find the courage last week to take a stand against antisemitism.

In the past month, Omar has attracted a hornets’ nest of controversy by spouting classic antisemitic tropes in successive, widely-condemned incidents. First, the Minnesota Democrat tweeted, “It’s all about the Benjamins baby,” using an age-old crude antisemitic charge to suggest that pro-Israel lobbyists pay to silence criticism of the Israeli government. But just after issuing what seemed to be a deflective apology, Omar told a progressive town hall audience that Israel’s supporters are guilty of dual loyalty — i.e., “allegiance to a foreign country.”

Omar’s comments drew bipartisan condemnation from legislators, and even upset some of her allies from the Muslim-American left. Hussein Ibish, a Progressive Muslim Union co-founder and Bloomberg columnist, described Omar’s remarks as “a disaster that reinforces divisive stereotypes about supposed Muslim hostility to Jews.” New York Magazine columnist Jonathan Chait accused antisemites like Omar of “smuggling their biases into criticisms of Israel.”

Reminiscent of 2015, Islamist lobbyists won the day. Teaming up with a consortium of far-left activists and Muslim advocacy groups, 19 CAIR officials signed on to a letter asking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to “pass a resolution that equally condemns antisemitism and Islamophobia.” Signatories included CAIR-Los Angeles Executive Director Hussam Ayloush, who previously wrote that the Middle East would be “better off” if Israel were “terminated,” and CAIR San Francisco director Zahra Billoo, who maintains that Israel does not have “a right to exist.”

Despite the hateful prejudice expressed by these petitioners, Pelosi and the House caved.

Congress ultimately condemned antisemitism — but not without so many other hatreds. Omar was never mentioned. Pelosi engaged in her own bigotry, the soft form exhibited by low expectations, by arguing that Omar, an elected member of Congress on the House Foreign Relations Committee, “did not understand the words she was saying.”

By reducing Omar’s bigoted remarks to “legitimate criticism” of Israel — the Middle East’s sole liberal democracy — CAIR is normalizing the same offensive behaviors that inspired the House resolution.

It’s a mindset that is deeply rooted among many Islamists. CAIR co-founder and Executive Director Nihad Awad advanced a common antisemitic theme when he applied otherworldly characteristics to Jews as a world power. “[T]he Jews through their Zionist machinery have power over all the agencies and organs of the United States government,” he wrote in an antisemitic pamphlet issued prior to founding CAIR.

CAIR, an Islamist nonprofit which despises Israel and revels in Islamophobia, represents Omar’s base. She has helped CAIR raise money in the past and is scheduled to appear at a CAIR-Los Angeles fundraiser later this month. She will share the podium with Hassan Shibly, the chief executive of CAIR’s Florida chapter and an outspoken antisemite in his own right, who has refused to condemn Hamas and has vilified “Israel [and] its supporters” as the “enemies of God and humanity.”

It comes as no surprise, then, that Shibly would whitewash Omar’s blatant antisemitism, cheering the congresswoman last week for “expanding the overdue conversation on why [the] US has enabled Israel to commit massive crimes against Palestinian civilians.”

Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) members also reportedly played an instrumental role in forcing the Democratic establishment to revise Thursday’s House resolution to emphasize Islamophobia and white supremacism. CBC chairman Cedric Richmond (D-LA), who boycotted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s 2015 speech before a joint session of Congress, co-sponsored the legislation and appealed to his colleagues to incorporate all forms of bigotry.

The prevailing antisemitic attitudes embraced by far-left members of Congress did not emerge overnight. This hatred was born out of a lasting courtship between some members of the CBC and CAIR, who regularly exchange dignitaries to attend each other’s conferences and fundraisers.

The caucus maintains ties to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a vociferous antisemite who has referred to Jews as “termites” and to Adolf Hitler as a “very great man.”

“When members of the CBC shielded Omar from questions following her antisemitic comments, who could be remotely surprised?” asked Erielle Davidson, senior contributor at The Federalist. “The irony of the feigned shock from various corners is that Omar is not an aberration or an exception to CBC members — she is the rule.”

With exceptional political reach on Capitol Hill, CAIR has persuaded Congress to minimize or excuse examples of antisemitism while enunciating anti-Muslim bias. Through an increasingly critical alliance with a far-left Democratic caucus, the Islamist front group has popularized its odious brand of hatred and found willing adherents among influential members of Congress.

This article was originally published by The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

Benjamin Baird is a writer for Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum. He is a graduate of Middle Eastern studies from the American Military University, a member of the Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa, and a US Army infantry veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.