Thursday, December 2nd | 28 Kislev 5782

Subscribe
March 3, 2020 7:19 pm
0

Sanders’s Snub of AIPAC, Slam of Israel’s Premier an Outrage for Many Conference Attendees

avatar by Heather Robinson / JNS.org

Democratic US presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders is accompanied by his wife Jane O’Meara Sanders and other relatives as he speaks at his New Hampshire primary night rally in Manchester, NH, US, February 11, 2020. Photo: REUTERS/Rick Wilking.

JNS.org – The general consensus at this year’s annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was that Democratic frontrunner Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) decision to snub the event—a requisite stop for US presidential contenders on the campaign trail—was a big disappointment. Attendees also expressed concern that the some of the senator’s recent remarks could spur antisemitism.

Although the mood exiting the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, DC, on Monday was largely upbeat, with attendees, who travel to the nation’s capital to lobby their members of Congress on behalf of the US-Israel alliance, generally pleased about Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive election victory that day (although it remains uncertain if he can still form a government), when asked their feelings about Sanders’s decision to shun this year’s AIPAC policy conference, many expressed outrage.

“I’m thrilled about Bibi’s re-election,” said Michael Elman, 64, a retina surgeon from Baltimore. “Hopefully, he’ll be able to form a government. I support his policies. We think it’s a good move for the Jewish people, and hopefully, they can get out of this paralysis.”

He added that “Bernie is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. With friends like that, we don’t need enemies.”

Related coverage

December 1, 2021 2:52 pm

Pakistan Lifts Ban on Islamic Extremist Group, Threatening Western Countries With ‘Security Challenges’

Pakistan dropped its ban on a violent Islamist group that led attempts to intimidate non-Muslims against sharing images and caricatures...

Sanders’s decision to skip the conference, as well as his recent characterization on Twitter of the historically bipartisan advocacy group as providing a “platform … for leaders who express bigotry,” coupled with his characterization of Netanyahu as a “reactionary racist” in last week’s Democratic presidential debate in South Carolina, comes at a time when many Jewish-Americans are distressed about a rise in antisemitism associated with extremism at both ends of the political spectrum, and what they perceive as a Democratic Party increasingly populated by members who are hostile to Israel.

Both his comments and his absence reverberated throughout this year’s event, with speakers ranging from US Vice President Mike Pence to House Minority leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), to former New York City Mayor and Democratic presidential contender Michael Bloomberg making reference to them.

In his speech on Monday, Pence said if elected, Sanders would be “the most anti-Israel president in the history of this nation.” And in reference to Sanders’s remarks, he said, “it is wrong to boycott and slander Israel. It is wrong to boycott and slander AIPAC.”

Bloomberg called Sanders “dead wrong” to describe AIPAC as a “racist platform.”

Attendees by and large strongly echoed these sentiments, although there were a small number of dissenters.

“To associate pro-Israel advocacy with bigotry, [Sanders] is advancing antisemitism,” said Robin Hanerfeld of Bethesda, Md. “He’s emboldening antisemites to start using the word to describe us.”

Anne Brody Elovic, 58, a homemaker from the heavily Jewish village of Skokie, Ill., said “Bernie Sanders is a putz. If you want to run this country, have the chutzpah to come stand here and tell us what you think.”

Some who expressed disappointment in Sanders self-identified as Democrats.

“Among this crowd, there’s a resounding agreement that Bernie made a bad decision,” said Gaby Cosgrove, a dentist from Los Angeles. “As a very devoted Democrat, I feel he’s embarrassed me.”

Referring to Democratic candidates who either spoke or addressed the conference by satellite, Cosgrove added that she thought Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) “were wonderful.” She said the same of Bloomberg, who was there in person.

‘Extremism tends not to be good for minorities’

Among those taking strong exception to Sanders’s recent statements claiming AIPAC provides a “platform for leaders who express bigotry” were non-Jewish African-American and Hispanic Israel-supporters in attendance. Many had traveled from across the country at their own expense to show their support for Israel and the values they believe Israel upholds.

“If AIPAC promotes bigotry, then why am I here? Why is there a whole constituency group led by African-Americans here?” said London Camel, 20, a student at Florida Agricultural Mechanical University in Tallahassee, Fla.

“The organization is bipartisan and about dialogue, so why not come, Senator Sanders?” posed Landen Coles, 19, a student at the University of Miami.

Older African-American Israel-supporters echoed the younger generation’s sentiments and added some of their own. “Senator Sanders should keep in mind that extremism tends not to be good for minorities,” said Eric McLendon, 56, of New York, who works in commercial real estate.

Nonetheless, two of about two-dozen AIPAC attendees interviewed expressed some degree of qualified support for Sanders, saying that although they disagreed with his recent statements about Netanyahu and AIPAC, they supported his right to make them and would consider voting for him to be the next president.

“Israel’s important to me, but I’m not a one issue voter,” said Jonah Dubin, 21, a student at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pa. “Bloomberg is standing in a better place on Israel, [but] lot of people feel Sanders would be better on health care.”

But, added Dubin, “It influences my decision to vote for Sanders in a negative way that he didn’t come here.”

Some cited the values of debate and discussion in voicing their disapproval of Sanders’s choice to rebuff AIPAC.

Originally from Venezuela, Veronica Figoli of Denver, Colo., said life back home “became broken” when people ceased being able to have civil conversations. A lifelong Democrat, she said she disagrees with Sanders’s characterization of AIPAC and decision not to attend, emphasizing that she believes “the most dangerous conversation is the one which never happens.”

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.