Sunday, January 24th | 11 Shevat 5781

December 17, 2020 7:14 am

Examining the Palestinian Track Record of Rejection and Violence

avatar by Yoram Ettinger


Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas attends a virtual meeting, in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Sept. 3, 2020. Photo: Alaa Badarneh / Pool / File photo via Reuters.

The Palestinian conflict did not erupt in 1967, nor in 1948.

In November 1917, the Balfour Declaration called for the establishment of “a national home for the Jewish People” in Palestine, which was the accepted international name of the Land of Israel since the 5th century BCE.

The declaration, issued by the British Foreign Minister, stated that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities [Arabs] in Palestine.” The declaration acknowledged the ancient national Jewish roots in the Land of Israel, and that Jews were indigenous there, returning to — not colonizing — their homeland.

In April 1920, the post-World War I San Remo Conference reaffirmed the Balfour Declaration and laid the legal foundation for the creation of 22 Arab states and one Jewish state. It was signed by all 51 members of the League of Nations in the August 1920 Treaty of Sevres between the Allied Powers and the Ottoman Empire.

Related coverage

January 24, 2021 7:58 am

Saudi Arabia Is Sending Joe Biden Mixed Messages

Saudi Arabia seems to be betting that President Joe Biden will be sufficiently cautious to avoid a rupture in relations...

Arab terrorism erupted in Jerusalem, Jaffa, and the Galilee in response to the emerging reestablishment of Jewish sovereignty in the Middle East, which is considered by Muslims as the abode of Islam.

In July 1922, the League of Nations entrusted Britain with the Mandate for Palestine. The Mandate highlighted “the historical connection of the Jewish people to Palestine, and the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.” The sole purpose of the Mandate was to establish a Jewish national home in “Palestine,” referring to the Land of Israel. The Mandate for Palestine has been included, since 1945, in Article 80 of the UN Charter, which preserves the inherent Jewish national rights in the Land of Israel.

In September 1922, the League of Nations and the UK transferred three-quarters of Palestine to the Hashemite Emirate of Transjordan, which gained independence in 1946.

In July 1937, intimidated by an unprecedented wave of intra-Arab and anti-Jewish Arab terrorism, Britain’s Peel Commission recommended the partition of Palestine. The Commission proposed to reduce the area of the Jewish state to 18% of Palestine, west of the Jordan River (parts of the coastal plane, the Galilee, Jezreel Valley, and Beit She’an Valley), while establishing an Arab state over 75% of the area, in addition to an international zone between Jerusalem and Jaffa.

The plan was vehemently rejected by the Arabs and Arab states, who intensified anti-Jewish terrorism.

In November 1947, the UN Special Committee on Palestine recommended the establishment of Jewish and Arab states, joined by economic union, with the Jerusalem-Bethlehem region as an international enclave.

Once again, the Jewish side accepted the UN plan, but the Arabs rejected it and launched a campaign to destroy the Jewish state, led by the military forces of five Arab countries (Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon). The Palestinian leadership — which had collaborated with Nazi Germany — threatened to transform Palestine into a land soaked in blood and scorched by fire.

In 2020, the Western foreign policy establishment tends to accord much weight to peaceful Palestinian diplomatic talk, overlooking the centrality of the Palestinian walk.

In 2020, Western political correctness sees the Palestinian issue through an oversimplified prism of human rights, ignoring history and the well-documented Palestinian vision, as highlighted by the (pre-1967!) 1959 and 1964 Fatah and PLO annihilationist charters, Palestinian hate education, and the well-documented Palestinian track record of intra-Arab and anti-Jewish terrorism — as well as their methodical rejection of all peace initiatives since the first part of the 20th century.

Will the Western foreign policy establishment overcome the temptation to persist in sacrificing the complex, unpredictable, intolerant, and frustrating Middle East reality on the altar of a make-believe Middle East coupled with well-intentioned eagerness to achieve peace now and in a convenient manner?

Yoram Ettinger is a former Israeli ambassador and commentator.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.