Dutch MPs Seek Answers From Government on Rising Antisemitism at Universities in the Netherlands
by Dion J. Pierre

University of Amsterdam. Photo Credit: Guilhem Vellut/Flickr.
Dutch lawmakers issued parliamentary questions to two cabinet ministers on Tuesday concerning their government’s response to antisemitism, amid reports of rising anti-Jewish hostility on university campuses in the Netherlands.
Ulysses Ellian, a member of parliament from the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), had previously submitted questions on the issue to Minister of Justice & Security Ferdinand Grapperhaus, to which he received no response, the Center for Information and Documentation Israel (CIDI) reported. Ellian’s inquiry was prompted by student complaints that antisemitism at Maastricht University, where a student was told that the Star of David is “a symbol of genocidal intentions,” has forced Jews to mask their identity.
Following additional complaints of antisemitism at schools such as University of Amsterdam and Leiden University, Ellian joined forces with fellow VVD party member, Hatte van der Woude, to ask Grapperhaus, as well as Minister of Education Ingrid van Engelshoven, if and how the government plans to address concerns that Dutch universities are becoming unsafe for Jewish students.
“Students should feel free and safe. So also should Jewish students,” Ellian said Tuesday on Twitter. “And a university should not, consciously or unconsciously, be a breeding ground for antisemitism.”
In November, Leiden University Students for Palestine and the MENA Student Association hosted a panel that, according to CIDI writer Luke Smith, featured “activist” academics, one of whom stridently supported a government boycott of Israel. The student audience applauded speakers who described Zionism, the movement supporting the self-determination of the Jewish people, as “colonialism and racism,” and who stated, “We are fighting a world system of oppression and a network of imperialism.”
That same month, the University Amsterdam Centre for Middle Eastern Studies sponsored a lecture series on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, to which no Jewish or pro-Israel academics were invited as guest panelists.
During the May conflict between Israel and Palestinian terrorist groups in Gaza, a Jewish Maastricht University student who wrote Facebook posts denouncing antisemitic language used by anti-Zionist activists was sent texts reading, “dirty kk Jew, I hope they will open the gas chambers again” and, “Your stinking people will be destroyed…dirty AIDS Jew,” CIDI reported in November. When she told school administrators about the incident, they allegedly said it was a “personal conflict” and asked her, “Don’t you think you deserved it for being unkind?” She later transferred to a different school.
Also in May, at Leiden University, a lecturer in Middle Eastern Studies began participating in anti-Israel protests and started a petition calling for the Dutch government to sever ties with Israel, prompting Leiden University Rector Magnificus Hester Bijl to declare that boycotting the Jewish state is incongruous with the university’s values.
“Leiden University is a stronghold of freedom, where freedom of expressions is a great asset,” she tweeted in May, responding to a reporter’s question about the university’s stance on the petition, which was signed by over 400 academics. “We stand for inclusiveness and social safety in expressing that opinion. Calling for a boycott is not one of them. And, of course, the constitution is the limit.”
In Tuesday’s parliamentary questions, Ellian and Hatte van der Woude asked the government if it is aware of such activity on Dutch college campuses, which includes reports that Jewish students are browbeaten by professors who support the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel, and are ignored by university officials when they complain that this behavior violates academic freedom.
They also asked ministers if they view calls for Israel’s destruction as a form of antisemitism, and whether it is appropriate for universities to fund pro-BDS organizations when the government “refrains from such funding.”
“What will you do to ensure that Jewish students feel safe and free, both physically and academically, in universities?” they asked.
Hakeem Jeffries Announces He Will Not House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has come out against a bid to cut off US military aid to Israel, while calling for a “major reset” of Washington’s relationship with the Jewish state. In a “Dear Colleague” letter to fellow Democrats on Tuesday, Jeffries said he would vote against an amendment led by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), and co-sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), that would strip roughly $3.3 billion in annual military financing for Israel — while preserving $500 million for missile-defense programs such as Iron Dome — from the fiscal 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. The House could vote on the measure as early as this week. Aligning himself with the ranking Democrats on the Appropriations and Foreign Affairs committees, Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Gregory Meeks (D-NY), as well as the advocacy group J Street, Jeffries called the proposal too sweeping. “As written, it is overly broad in that it prohibits or would limit the use of funds for longstanding initiatives related to humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, peace-building and US Embassy operations,” he wrote, adding that the “so-called Massie amendment” would restrict US efforts to confront Hamas, Hezbollah “and other terrorist organizations in the region who are sworn enemies of both the United States and Israel.” Citing deep divisions within the party over Israel, Jeffries said leadership would not pressure members to follow his lead. “There are good faith reasons that will result in Members voting in a variety of different ways with respect to the amendment,” he wrote, noting that the caucus was not whipping the vote. At the same time, Jeffries argued that US policy toward the region “must change,” tying his call for a “major reset” to criticism of what he termed the “far-right Netanyahu government.” He wrote that America’s commitment to “Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and homeland for the Jewish people must remain ironclad,” while urging strong US support for the creation of an independent Palestinian state. Israeli governments have long rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state along Israel’s borders, warning that it would pose an existential security threat and leave major population centers exposed to attack. Jeffries also said Gaza must undergo “complete reconstruction and modernization” and that “Hamas must be disarmed and removed from power.” Jeffries further signaled that the next US-Israel aid agreement should require Israel to cover more of its own defense costs. The current 10-year memorandum of understanding, signed under President Barack Obama in 2016, provides Israel about $3.8 billion annually — $3.3 billion in military financing and $500 million for missile defense — and expires in 2028. “Israel has an advanced economy and is capable of paying for its own sophisticated weapons, as the Prime Minister recently acknowledged,” Jeffries wrote, adding that any future arrangement should mirror US defense agreements with other Western allies and “strictly adhere to our human rights laws and values.” His stance placed him between the two poles of a party increasingly split over Israel. Hours after his letter circulated, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX), sent a competing letter urging Democrats to back the Massie amendment, and progressives including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said they would vote to cut the aid. Support for Israel among Democratic voters has fallen sharply during the war in Gaza. An Associated Press-NORC poll conducted in June found that 52 percent of Democrats say Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians, while a Pew Research Center survey found that roughly 80 percent of Democrats hold a negative view of Israel. In April, a majority of Senate Democrats — 40 of the caucus’s 47 members — voted for at least one of two resolutions to block certain arms sales to Israel, though the measures failed. Supporters of continued assistance say it preserves Israel’s qualitative military edge and bolsters a key US partner against Iran-backed groups, while critics want aid conditioned on Israeli policy changes, particularly over the conduct of the war in Gaza. The upcoming vote is expected to underscore the widening gap between the party’s pro-Israel wing and its growing bloc of aid critics. for Amendment to Strip Israel Aid
The Colonizer Claim Against Israel Fails History
Irish Music, Arts and Wellness Festival Bans Current or Former IDF Soldiers
Is Belief in God Irrational?
Cold-Blooded Murderer Is Praised as a Hero By Palestinian Leaders and Media
Israel Confirms Participation in 2027 Eurovision Song Contest in Bulgaria
Saar Slams Kallas Over ‘Obsessive Campaign Against Israel’ After EU Trade Sanctions Fail
Statue Honoring Alfred Dreyfus Finds Permanent Home in Paris More Than a Century After His Exoneration
Marco Rubio Vows to ‘Dismantle’ ICC, Blasting Controversial Court for ‘Waging War’ Against US
Pennsylvania College Founds Partnership with Haifa University to Study Antisemitism





Marco Rubio Vows to ‘Dismantle’ ICC, Blasting Controversial Court for ‘Waging War’ Against US
Israel Confirms Participation in 2027 Eurovision Song Contest in Bulgaria
Cold-Blooded Murderer Is Praised as a Hero By Palestinian Leaders and Media
Irish Music, Arts and Wellness Festival Bans Current or Former IDF Soldiers
Is Belief in God Irrational?



