The British media “debate” about British actress Emma Watson’s social media expression of “solidarity” with Palestinians isn’t really a debate of any real merit.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Emma Watson (@emmawatson)

In fact, if Israel’s former UN Ambassador Danny Danon hadn’t falsely accused the Harry Potter star of antisemitism, it’s unlikely that there would be a row at all over her Instagram post.

10 points from Gryffindor for being an antisemite.@EmmaWatson pic.twitter.com/Qaqkx36JSg

— Ambassador Danny Danon | דני דנון (@dannydanon) January 3, 2022

I wrote that Danon “falsely” accused Watson of antisemitism because — though there’s a proven correlation between extreme anti-Israel sentiment and antisemitism — there’s of course nothing intrinsically anti-Jewish about expressing solidarity with the Palestinians.

I’ve in fact argued in a post condemning cancel culture, that pro-Israel advocates, and activists fighting anti-Jewish racism, should be extremely careful when using the term antisemitism, and should normally only do so in accordance with the IHRA Working Definition. Even then, as IHRA makes clear, “the overall context” must be taken into account when determining whether rhetoric crosses the line into antisemitism.

However, in the media storm that ensued after Danon’s accusation, one question doesn’t seem to have been asked about the politically outspoken actress: Did she ever use her considerable social media influence to express, to her tens of millions of followers, “solidarity” with British Jews during the Labour Party antisemitism row under Jeremy Corbyn — or during the huge surge, last May, of antisemitic incidents during Israel’s war with Hamas?

Though Watson spoke out against racism and “white privilege” in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, and has advocated for gender equality, we couldn’t find any evidence of even a carefully worded condemnation of antisemitism amidst what many British Jews perceived as an existential threat to their community.

I ask whether she ever expressed solidarity with British Jews for two reasons: First, because I honestly don’t know.

Also, because it would be telling if it turns out she stayed silent amidst the outbreak of anti-Jewish incidents last Spring, and during a Labour Party racism scandal so bad that the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) found the party guilty of three breaches of the Equality Act.

If she didn’t speak out, it would serve as further vindication of the thesis of David Baddiel’s book “Jews Don’t Count,” that antisemitism is not taken as seriously by the anti-racist, identitarian left — and even mainstream literary, political, or media personalities — as bigotry towards other minorities.

Danny Danon’s accusation that Watson’s expression of solidarity with Palestinians is antisemitic was scurrilous and unserious. But the broader question of what precisely it would take to motivate British celebrities to speak up for the country’s tiny Jewish minority is one that should trouble anyone who’s intellectually honest and is sincere in their opposition to racism in all its forms.

Adam Levick serves co-editor of CAMERA UK – an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA).

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.