In an April 20th Guardian article (“New NUS leader welcomes antisemitism inquiry, but fears for her safety”) Sally Weale, the outlet’s education correspondent, casts Shaima Dallali, the new president of the National Union of Students (NUS), as a victim while downplaying her record of antisemitism.

Readers are told that the current investigation into antisemitism within the NUS — which was prompted by complaints from Jewish student organizations, including the Union of Jewish Students (UJS), and a letter signed by 21 former NUS presidents — has made Dallali feel “unsafe.”

The article then quotes her, saying that she’s been “misrepresented since her election and denied that she was antisemitic.”

However, the only example of Dallali’s antisemitism by cited by The Guardian is a Twitter post from 10 years ago which read: “Khaybar Khaybar O Jews … Muhammad’s army will return Gaza” — referencing the Muslim massacre of the Jews of the town of that name in northwestern Arabia in 628 CE.

Weale then writes:

Dallali has apologized for the tweet, saying she is not the same person she was then and has since changed the language she uses to talk about the Israel-Palestine conflict. [emphasis added]

However, The Guardian fails to cite widely reported evidence that she hasn’t in fact “changed the language she uses” to talk about the conflict.

As the Jewish Chronicle reported, at the height of the war between Israel and Hamas last year, Dallali tweeted a justification for Hamas terror, writing:

Palestinians have a right to resist by all means possible — even with weapons — this right is acknowledged in international law — Hamas did not start the aggression, what would you like them to do for example? [emphasis added]

This post came just two days after three Israelis were killed when a barrage of rockets were fired from Gaza at Tel Aviv.

That Arabic language post, translated for Jewish Currents by CAMERA Arabic, continued: “Does this serve the Palestinian Cause? An important question. To my point of view the answer is according to your opinion regarding the solution of the cause — but armed resistance is a right and we should accept this.”

On May 29 of last year, the Dallali tweeted: “From the river to the sea,” a chant understood as a call for Israel’s destruction.

And, the same month, Dallali also wrote: “Good morning to everyone except Zionists, settler colonialist and apartheid sympathisers. Free Palestine.”

Further, in an 2018 article, she praised, as a “moral compass for the Muslim community at large,” Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who is banned from entering the the US and UK due in part to his support for suicide bombings. Al-Qaradawi also prayed for “every last” Jew to be killed. Though the Guardian article, in the penultimate paragraph, alluded to her support for the hate preacher, it referred to him as “homophobic” — but not antisemitic.

In addition to The Guardian’s obfuscation of Dallali’s record of antisemitism, a more recent article in The Times did so as well.

That May 5 article (“Students say NUS chief Shaima Dallali is ‘victim of a smear campaign’ over antisemitism”) by Education Editor Nicola Woolcock similarly opened with charges of the alleged “smear campaign” against her, while, like the Guardian article, only citing the one example of antisemitism from 10 years ago.

In the Guardian story, Dallali said this about the unfair criticism she’s faced, without being challenged by the journalist:

Unfortunately, as a black Muslim woman, it is something that I expected because I’ve seen it happen to other black Muslim women when they take up positions in the student union or the NUS, where they are attacked based on their political beliefs or their pro-Palestinian stance.

As we’ve demonstrated, the criticism she’s faced from Jewish students and others has nothing to do with her gender, race, or religion, and has everything to do with her well-documented record of peddling antisemitic rhetoric and expressions of support for violence and extremism.

Adam Levick serves as co-editor of CAMERA UK — an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA), where a version of this article first appeared.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.