An Israeli soldier stands during a two-minute siren marking the annual Israeli Holocaust Remembrance Day, at an installation at the site of the Nova festival where party goers were killed and kidnapped during the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas terrorists from Gaza, in Reim, southern Israel, May 6, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Ammar Awad

In 67 BCE, with the death of Queen Salome Alexandra, the golden age of the Hasmonean dynasty collapsed into a bloody civil war. The prolonged struggle exacted a heavy toll, but the true beneficiaries were Judea’s enemies — especially the Romans, who exploited the chaos to bring the kingdom under imperial control. Internal strife led to the loss of Jewish sovereignty, and Jewish independence would not be restored until the 20th century.

More than 2,000 years have passed, yet the lesson remains painfully relevant. The events of October 7, 2023, shocked the people of Israel, who had been consumed by intense internal divisions. The debate over judicial reform had polarized Israeli society to an unprecedented degree. Yet, within hours of Hamas’ brutal attack, those differences faded — Israel stood united as one against a ruthless enemy.

On October 8, 2023, we witnessed a different Israel: unified, resilient, and invincible. Political squabbles suddenly became secondary to the urgent need to defend the nation. Volunteers flooded combat zones, donations poured in, and the entire country rallied behind soldiers, hostages, the wounded, and the displaced.

Now, as time passes, we find ourselves slipping back into historical patterns reminiscent of the Hasmonean civil war. Just weeks after a fragile ceasefire with Hamas, public discourse has once again turned to bitter disputes over reforms, legislation, and political interests. Power struggles between the coalition and opposition have resumed, and the atmosphere feels increasingly fractured. Have we truly learned nothing?

Social media is rife with venomous rhetoric, with each faction accusing the other of betraying national values and causing the chaos that led to October 7. Once again, we are forgetting a painful historical truth: our enemies are not waiting for us to resolve our differences — they are simply waiting for us to be weak enough to strike again. They do not care who supported judicial reform and who opposed it. They see us as one people — and sometimes, we need to remind ourselves of that, too.

Yet, those most responsible for acknowledging this reality — our leaders — continue to act as if nothing has changed. Instead of fostering unity, members of the Knesset, from both the coalition and opposition, are fueling the flames. They are not working to mend divisions but to deepen them, driven by a desperate chase for likes and shares on social media.

Instead of leading toward reconciliation, they pit citizens against each other, adding fuel to an already raging fire, reducing national unity to a cheap political tool.

It is time for new leadership — leadership that prioritizes the welfare of the people above all else. Leadership that is open to fresh ideas and unafraid to make bold decisions. Leadership that unites rather than divides, that seeks the greater good rather than petty victories.

True unity does not mean uniformity — it means embracing diverse perspectives and finding common ground. We need leaders who will listen to all sectors of society, regardless of religion, ethnicity, or background, and create a true national home. Leaders who serve the people rather than themselves, from both coalition and opposition, and who act with a sense of duty and responsibility. Leaders who will learn from history — both its triumphs and its failures — and guide us toward a future of hope, prosperity, and security. A future we deserve.

Itamar Tzur is the author of The Invention of the Palestinian Narrative and an Israeli scholar specializing in Middle Eastern history. He holds a Bachelor’s degree with honors in Jewish History and a Master’s degree with honors in Middle Eastern studies. As a senior member of the “Forum Kedem for Middle Eastern Studies and Public Diplomacy,” he leverages his academic expertise to deepen understanding of regional dynamics and historical contexts.