Friday, September 30th | 27 Elul 5776

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
January 13, 2014 8:02 am
6

A Pavlovian Obsession: Human Rights Watch Targets Ariel Sharon

avatar by Gerald Steinberg / JNS.org

Email a copy of "A Pavlovian Obsession: Human Rights Watch Targets Ariel Sharon" to a friend

Related coverage

September 30, 2016 3:06 pm
0

Shimon Peres, a Leader for All Seasons

Shimon Peres understood the Biblical verse “to everything there is a season.” When he was a young man working for David Ben-Gurion,...

Ariel Sharon's funeral.

JNS.org – Like vultures circling a carcass, the leaders of New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) prepared yet another attack against Ariel Sharon. Within hours of his death on Jan.11, HRW proved that their Pavlovian obsession has not waned, publishing a press release that again highlighted this organization’s double standards and irresponsible disregard of both facts and international law. Sharon, as HRW’s stand-in for all issues related to Israel, was accused of every conceivable “war crime” and violation, while the history of mass terror and other forms of Arab and Palestinian brutality was erased. Once again, the radical ideologues and immoral Israel-bashers who control HRW demonstrated that in their eyes, Israelis are sub-human and therefore have no human rights.

The inflated accusations and abusive language in HRW’s statement following Sharon’s death stand in glaring contrast to their immoral silence regarding Arab and Middle Eastern terror leaders and tyrants. When Yasser Arafat died in November 2004, HRW issued no statement referring to impunity for crimes against humanity resulting from the Palestinian leader’s central role in mass terror campaigns.

Additionally, HRW’s statements following the death of Osama bin Laden are a textbook example of moral confusion and obfuscation, referring vaguely to “the devastating human toll that terrorism has brought to every continent of the world” and to the September 11, 2001 attacks and other attacks for which “bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization is blamed.” Regarding the American anti-terror operation that killed bin Laden, HRW decided that it did “not have enough information about the killing to draw conclusions about whether it was lawful or not…. The US government should provide all the relevant facts about Osama bin Laden’s death to clarify whether it was justified under international law.”

HRW’s abysmal record in the Middle East is particularly salient in the endorsement of Libyan’s tyrant Muammar Qaddafi and his sons as “human rights reformers.” In May 2009, HRW Middle East and North Africa director Sarah Leah Whitson authored an article in the influential US-based publication Foreign Policy, titled “Tripoli Spring” and subtitled “How Libya’s behind-the-scenes reformer is actually, well, reforming.”  Whitson’s praise was unequivocal: “the real impetus for the transformation rests squarely with a quasi-governmental organization, the Qaddafi Foundation for International Charities and Development.” On December 12, 2009, HRW held what was presented as a news conference in Libya—the U.S State Department referred to this event as helping to “solidify Saif al-Islam’s reputation as a ‘reformer.'” Two op-eds written by HRW officials were published in the Guardian and by the Institute for Policy Studies. The first was titled “Is Libya opening up,” and the second, written by Whitson, was headlined “Postcard from… Tripoli” and embraced the Qaddafi human rights reform fraud.

In contrast, Whitson and HRW have a long history of automatically and viscerally condemning Israel, based on little or no credible information. HRW’s statement condemning Sharon upon his death briefly and selectively quoted from the judicial commission that investigated Sharon’s responsibility related to the Christian Phalange killings of Palestinians in the 1982 Lebanon war, distorting the process and reports beyond recognition. This again highlights HRW’s consistent anti-Israel obsession and exploitation of universal human rights principles to promote personal and ideological agendas.

HRW also plays a central role in the processes by which national and international legal structures and principles are being abused as part of political warfare. While Sharon was serving as Prime Minister and had the grave responsibility for ending the Palestinian terror campaign of brutal bus bombings and other war crimes, HRW officials chose instead to support a cynical effort by Palestinian groups to bring a frivolous lawfare case against Sharon in Belgium. This case triggered a flood of efforts to exploit “universal jurisdiction” statutes and frameworks, including the International Criminal Court, that were created in order to bring genocidal leaders to justice, for the pursuit of partisan political campaigns.

In 2009, the founder of Human Rights Watch, Robert Bernstein, highlighted the moral failures of his own organization, particularly in ignoring the systematic abuses of Middle Eastern regimes. Bernstein also referred to HRW reports on the Israeli-Arab conflict “that are helping those who wish to turn Israel into a pariah state.” Indeed, as the latest obsessive attack demonstrates, it is HRW itself that is leading this campaign, based on double standards and misinformation, to delegitimize Israel.

Gerald M. Steinberg is president of Jerusalem-based research institution NGO Monitor and is professor of political science at Bar Ilan University.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • Carl

    There should be a concerted effort to expose and condemn this organization’s horrific double standards and misappropriation of human rights, just as was done for the ASA after their recent BDS vote. How sick that Whitson can’t behave in a civil manner after the death of a respected national leader, instead hurling slanderous accusations that were not leveled even against mass murderering terrorists like bin-Laden or Arafat. Shameful!

  • Lynne T

    If I recall correctly, HRW has also weighed in against the French ban on stage performances by the notoriously antisemetic “performer” Dieudounne M’bala M’bala, but recall no such concerns being uttered about TV Network France 2’s attempts to silence Phillip Karsenty for demanding a correction of the record vis a vis the Mohammed Al-Dura fakery that lies behind a great deal of resurgent French antisemetism.

    And of course, not a word about the state of fear that French Jews are living under as they have been targeted by violent Islamists, many of whom are no doubt further encouraged by viewing M’bala M’bala’s materials via the internet.

  • Walter Bachner

    The HRW even invoked Jews when complaining about the lack of Gay rights in Africa and Russia.

    The Trouble With Tradition
    When “Values” Trample Over Rights

    by Graeme Reid (@Graemecreid), Director, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program

    “Tradition!” proclaims Tevye the milkman, in his foot-stomping opening to the musical Fiddler on the Roof. “Tradition!”

    Tevye’s invocation of the familiar as a buffer against the vagaries of his hardscrabble life rings true—after all, what is more reassuring, more innocuous, than the beliefs and practices of the past?

  • HaroldT

    What is so disgusting is that the USA ,UK and European contries belong to this organization and contribute to it.

  • Alain Henry

    Bin Laden had nothing to do with 911.

    • Hannah F

      Wow, comments from an extraterrestrial!

Algemeiner.com