Monday, November 20th | 2 Kislev 5778

Close

Be in the know!

Get our exclusive daily news briefing.

Subscribe
July 20, 2016 3:55 pm

British-Jewish Leaders Call on Government to Adopt Definition of Antisemitism That Includes Israel-Hatred

avatar by Lea Speyer

Email a copy of "British-Jewish Leaders Call on Government to Adopt Definition of Antisemitism That Includes Israel-Hatred" to a friend
UK Parliament. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

UK Parliament. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Jewish leaders in Britain last week called on the government to adopt a new working definition of antisemitism — which makes provisions for anti-Zionism — in a united move aimed at combating rising Jew-hatred in the UK.

In testimony before the Parliamentary Home Affairs Committee on its investigation into antisemitism, Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis and Sir Mick Davis, chairman of the umbrella group Jewish Leadership Council (JLC) — which represents 32 major British organizations — urged Parliament to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.

“I would love it if this group referred to the European Union Monitoring Centre (EUMC) definition, linked to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition, as the guideline. This is what we would like everybody to follow. This is how we want authorities to apply the rules for anyone who steps out of line,” Mirvis stated.

“It is my position, as well as that of the Jewish Leadership Council and the Community Security Trust, the British Jewish community’s authoritative voice on antisemitsim and community security, that this committee uses the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism as its guide as well,” Davis stated in his written testimony.

Related coverage

October 1, 2017 8:23 pm
7

Catalonia Independence Activist: Jewish Community Split Over Secession Vote

The Jewish community in Catalonia is “heavily split” on the question of possible independence for the region of northeast Spain,...

As reported by The Algemeiner, the IHRA definition was adopted by 31 countries in May, in a historic move seen as a major step towards combating the reemerging phenomenon of global antisemitism.

According to the IHRA definition:

Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestation of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

Of particular significance is the accompanying text, which presents “contemporary examples” of modern antisemitism, and includes reference specifically to Israel. An earlier draft of this definition was formulated some 10 years ago and circulated by the EUMC, the human rights arm of the EU. While the definition was never officially adopted, it appeared on the EUMC website. Following criticism for this, the EUMC eventually removed the posting.

Echoing the IHRA’s inclusion of antisemitic references to Israel, Mirvis told the committee, “Zionism has been an integral part of Judaism from the dawn of our faith…Open any prayer book and you will find Israel jumping out at you. It is the center of what we are…If you are an anti-Zionist, you are anti everything.”

By not adopting one agreed-upon definition of antisemitism, Mirvis said, “Anybody can say anything about what is or is not, which is why it is so important for there to be that clear definition.”

The testimonies of Mirvis and Davis came after the release of a long-awaited report by the Labour Party into allegations of antisemitism within party ranks. The inquiry — which some have called a “whitewash” — concluded that while there is an “occasionally toxic atmosphere” within Labour, it is “not overrun by antisemitism, Islamophobia, or other forms of racism.” The investigation made 20 recommendations, but did not approve lifetime bans for party members who engage in antisemitic or racist behavior.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Email This Article

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner
  • If you are an anti-Zionist, you are anti everything.” How dare he. Zionism is a political ideology just over 100 years old created and manufactured by a small coterie of individuals. It is based on the very ideal that one set of people are more worthy and important thatn another, based on their ethnic or religious background – and therefire fundamentally opposes teh basic universal charter for human rights that all people are born equal and have equal right to self determination. Judaism on the other hand is thousands of years old, and espouses love and respect.The very attempt to say Zionism (a) speaks for/represents or is representative of all Jewish people, whether they like it or not and (b) openly recognises the need to & espouses this need to displace local non Jewish populations, communities, people and cultures – while acknowleging that force and violence will be necessary – are both, in themselves – antisemitic in all senses of the word. How dare Mirvis try to manipulate both language and history to his own geopolitical advantage.

    • Uriel Priwes

      We’re it not for Zionism and the existence of the State of Israel the very existence of the Jewish people would be threatened. It is not too extreme to say that Judaism would not have long survived Hitler’s holocaust had not the State of Israel come into being. The entire history of the Jewish people is dominated by the longing to return to their own land. Mr. Brennan is so wrong in his view that hatred of Zionism is not identical with the wish to destroy Judaism. It is as ridiculous as to say that hatred of Great Britain is not the same as hatred of thr British people.

    • I’ve only just seen Tom Brennan’s post. It’s classic anti-Zionist doctrine which insists that Jews are a religion and not a people, and tries to separate Israel from the Jewish people by claiming, bizarrely, that since a handful of Jews oppose Zionism therefore Zionism doesn’t represent Jews. Brennan rejects self-determination for the Jewish people on artificial grounds which he apparently doesn’t apply to any other people: i.e. the double standards we are used to seeing. “Love Jews, hate Zionists” is his extremely unconvincing message.

  • Jay Lavine

    It should be called Judeophobia, not antisemitism, so as not to perpetuate the Hitlerian depiction of Jews as an ethnicity. Jews are not a race.

Algemeiner.com