Wednesday, May 12th | 1 Sivan 5781

August 4, 2017 4:50 pm

In Australia, Labor Party’s Support for Palestinian State Highlights Challenges Facing Israel

avatar by Sean Savage /

Australian Labor party leader Bill Shorten (left) meets with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the Israeli leader’s trip to Australia on February 24, 2017. Photo: Haim Zach / GPO. – According to some experts, the push for recognizing a Palestinian state within Australia’s Labor Party mirrors efforts by left-wing activists in other English-speaking countries to take a harder line against Israel.

The New South Wales (NSW) branch of Australia’s Labor party voted on July 30 to recognize the state of “Palestine.” The move was led by former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr, who called the effort a “historic shift,” and urged the broader Australian Labor party to adopt the position.

“As the oldest, the greatest, the biggest state branch we can’t afford to be stranded in history,” Carr said. “It is time now for another historic shift in Labor Party foreign policy. We must balance our just recognition of Israel with the equally just recognition of Palestine.”

The Israeli government has long opposed unilateral or third-party moves to recognize a Palestinian state, preferring to leave the matter to direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. The NSW Labor vote in Australia comes amid similar opposition to Israeli interests among far-left elements in America’s Democratic party and the UK’s Labour party. The Labour Party’s leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has battled accusations of antisemitism.

Related coverage

May 4, 2021 10:41 am

An Israeli Startup’s Concrete ‘Bio-Habitats’ Bring Life Back to Urban Coastal Waters

An Israeli environmental startup has developed a technology to address one of the world's least sexy problems — bringing concrete...

Last year, Australia’s Pacific island neighbor, New Zealand, co-sponsored a United Nations Security Council resolution that condemned Israel’s settlement policy, and described eastern Jerusalem’s Jewish holy sites as “occupied Palestinian territory.”

The motion passed by Australia’s NSW Labor branch included a clause about the right of both Israelis and Palestinians to live in states with “secure and recognized” boundaries.

Jeremy Jones, director of international affairs for the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), said that while international affairs are the purview of the broader Australian Labor party rather than the NSW branch, grassroots supporters of the Palestinian statehood motion are hoping to gain momentum on the issue ahead of the Labor Party’s national conference next year.

“The NSW branch, and other state and territory party units, have adopted resolutions which recommend unilateral recognition of ‘Palestine’ in recent years, which is a change from previous opposition to actions seen to preempt the outcome of negotiations between the parties,” Jones told

Despite having the largest number of seats in Australia’s House of Representatives, Labor has served as the country’s opposition party since 2013. The ruling center-right Liberal Party, headed by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, has not indicated a change in its support for a negotiated two-state solution — nor has the broader Labor Party.

Factors contributing to NSW Labor’s Palestinian statehood push include “the personal obsession of Bob Carr, the increasing membership within the party of people presumed to be anti-Israel, a belief in some quarters this policy will endear the party to Muslim Australians and the unpopularity of [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu amongst many centrist Labor activists,” Jones said.

Jones added that there is “a solid core of anti-Israel activists, mainly in the party’s left faction, who push for changes of Labor support for Israel, as well as a popular perception of Palestinians as victims who should be supported in any way possible by anyone who supports ‘social justice.’”

Following the NSW motion, Australian opposition leader Bill Shorten, head of the Labor Party, reiterated his support for the party’s long-held support for a two-state solution.

“There’s two issues, one is the legitimate aspirations, and I stress legitimate aspirations of Palestinians to have their own state and I do support that, but also the legitimate aspirations of the people of Israel to live in secure borders,” he said, Australia’s ABC News reported.

“If you support a two-state solution, ultimately that includes recognition of Palestine,” Shorten added.

Earlier this year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the first-ever trip to Australia by a sitting Israeli prime minister. During the visit, Netanyahu met with Shorten, who had been under internal party pressure at the time to raise the issue of recognizing Palestinian statehood with the Israeli leader. Yet in the meeting, there was no reported mention of a Palestinian statehood push, though Shorten did express general support for the concept.

“We want to see Israel safe and secure of its borders. We support the rights of the Palestinian people to have their own state,” Shorten said after the meeting, adding that “[Israeli] settlements and their expansion are a roadblock to peace that’s damaging to the peace process,” the Associated Press reported.

In an op-ed published in the Australian, the Palestinian envoy to Australia — Izzat Abdulhadi — argued that unilateral recognition of “Palestine” would “solidify Australia’s reputation as a good international citizen and increase its soft power by aligning its position with that of international law, the UN and the vast majority of the international community.”

Australia’s mainstream Jewish and pro-Israel organizations, meanwhile, argue that unilateral Palestinian statehood recognition would be counter-productive.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry said that if acted upon, NSW Labor’s measure “would open the door to a grave weakening of Australia’s traditional bipartisan consensus in favor of, and the [Australian Labor party’s] commitment to, a just and peaceful resolution of the conflict.”

Similarly, the AIJAC said that such motions “are problematic and unhelpful to advancing a two-state Israeli-Palestinian peace.”

In his op-ed, Abdulhadi cited a poll by Roy Morgan, a leading Australian market research company, which found that 73 percent of Australians support recognizing Palestinian statehood.

Yet Jones said that it is difficult to gauge the views of the Australian public on the issue, since poll questions are often misleading and framed in a way that leads to support for Palestinians’ “right” to a state.

“Anecdotal evidence suggests that most Australians, including most Jewish Australians, are attracted to the concept of an Israeli and Palestinian state, coexisting peacefully,” Jones said. He added that “serious policymakers” within Australia’s ruling and opposition parties do not believe unilateral recognition of a Palestinian entity — “which does not satisfy the criteria of statehood” — would contribute to Australians’ desired vision for a two-state solution.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.