Saturday, August 13th | 16 Av 5782

Subscribe
August 1, 2022 11:11 am
0

Biden Fights Back on ‘Apartheid State,’ But BDS Continues Its Lies

avatar by Alexander Joffe

Opinion

US President Joe Biden delivers remarks during a welcoming ceremony at Ben Gurion International Airport in Lod, near Tel Aviv, Israel, July 13, 2022. Photo: REUTERS/Ammar Awad

US President Joe Biden’s whirlwind visit to the Middle East produced few tangible gains in terms of restoring Israeli-Palestinian negotiations or promises to increase Saudi oil production. But Biden, long regarded as a heartfelt supporter of Israel, stated his firm opposition to calling Israel an “apartheid state,” and declared that those who do so are “mistaken.” The ramifications of this, and the joint declaration by the US and Israel which made it clear that US policy is to “firmly reject” BDS, have yet to be seen.

Aside from Biden’s rejection of the apartheid lie, the US president and Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid also signed the “Jerusalem U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Joint Declaration,” which states the two countries’ determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The declaration added:

The United States and Israel affirm that they will continue to work together to combat all efforts to boycott or de-legitimize Israel, to deny its right to self-defense, or to unfairly single it out in any forum, including at the United Nations or the International Criminal Court. While fully respecting the right to freedom of expression, they firmly reject the BDS campaign. The two countries will use the tools at their disposal to fight every scourge and source of antisemitism and to respond whenever legitimate criticism crosses over into bigotry and hatred or attempts to undermine Israel’s rightful and legitimate place among the family of nations. In this context, they express their deep concern over the global surge in antisemitism and reassert their commitment to counter this ancient hatred in all of its manifestations. The United States is proud to stand with the Jewish and democratic State of Israel, and with its people, whose uncommon courage, resilience, and spirit of innovation are an inspiration to so many worldwide.

The administration’s forthright condemnation of BDS drew a sharp line for Democratic candidates. As midterms approach, Democrats remain divided over Israel, with the results of redistricting complicating campaigns, especially for incumbents. In New York, Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, a strong Israel supporter, faces a challenge from State Senator Alessandra Biaggi, who has been endorsed by Squad leader Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). Biaggi distanced herself from AOC’s overt hostility over Israel, claiming that she supported Israel “because I am progressive.”

In contrast, New York State Assembly member Yuh-Line Niou, a candidate in the newly redrawn 10th District, stated that she is a firm supporter of BDS. Niou is one of several candidates to replace Rep. Jerry Nadler, who will be running in a different district.

Most BDS supporting candidates come from the extreme left wing of the Democratic Party, which has been colonized by the Democratic Socialists of America and the Working Families Party. But media outlets like CNN and The New York Times insist on framing the issue as right wing pro-Israel groups, namely AIPAC and Democratic Majority for Israel, intervening in primaries against J Street supported candidates that are uniformly represented as centrists or as virtuous supporters of Israeli-Palestinian peace.

Both media and J Street accounts depict Jewish political participation as abnormal, covert, plutocratic, and solely focused on Israel. Compounding this are accusations that AIPAC support is “driving a wedge between communities of color, especially progressives, and the Jewish community,” and targeting “women of color.”

Meanwhile, many anti-Israel progressive leaders have ties to hate and terror groups.

New reports indicate that 2018 campaign events for Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) were organized by individuals who had previously been found liable for a Hamas financing scheme. Those individuals had been indicted in the Holy Land Foundation case and had been ordered to pay a $156 million judgment to the family of an American citizen killed in a Hamas terror attack.

The Holy Land Foundation was shuttered without payment being rendered. The same individuals then launched American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), the leading US Muslim supporter of BDS. AMP support for Squad member Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) was also evident in reports that showed fundraising for Bush by Hamas supporter Neveen Ayash, who stated on social media that she would “set Israel on fire with my own hands & watch it burn to ashes along with every Israeli in it.’

The presence of three BDS supporting Democratic candidates in different races for the Maryland General Assembly, the anti-Israel resolutions in the North Carolina Democratic Party platform, and the prominence of antisemites such as Maher Abdel Qader in Democratic fundraising nation-wide, continues to demonstrate anti-Israel radicalization at the grassroots level.

In the academic sphere, the antisemitism crisis at the City University of New York (CUNY) continued. A group of Jewish students at the CUNY Law School filed a discrimination charge with the American Bar Association (ABA), alleging that, “the law school’s recent unanimous faculty adoption of a formal BDS policy that vulgarly and blatantly discriminates against students, prospective students, faculty and employees, and prospective faculty and employees on the basis of ethnicity, religion, and nationality.” This violates the ABA’s accreditation standards.

A civil rights complaint was also filed with the US Department of Education on behalf of Jewish students and faculty.

Fallout also continued from the refusal of CUNY Chancellor Félix V. Matos to appear at a City Council meeting on antisemitism called by Councilwoman Inna Vernikov of Brooklyn, a move that was condemned by Jewish leaders. While the committee heard testimony regarding the school’s antisemitic atmosphere, a CUNY official refused to discuss the antisemitic incidents. The faculty union head also stated falsely that he had not supported the BDS campaign in the union, and that he had reached out to members who had resigned over the policy.

The combination of dishonesty and disdain shown by CUNY administrators and faculty towards Jewish concerns reflects a sense of near impunity. With the rise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” bureaucracies in institutions like CUNY, which appear resolute in their determination to ignore Jews, the CUNY situation is a bellwether for the larger position of Jews on campus.

Elsewhere in the academic sphere, the Association for Israel Studies voted to disaffiliate itself from the Middle East Studies Association (MESA) as a result of the latter’s endorsement of BDS. For its part, MESA has continued to push BDS and anti-Israel policies, including in a letter to the US Department of Education stating its opposition to the IHRA working definition of antisemitism.

An investigation into antisemitism and “Islamophobia” at McGill University pointed to BDS campaigns as uniquely polarizing, resulting in harassment and feelings of persecution by both Jewish and Muslim students. The McGill report came as the student government suspended a pro-Palestinian group for three months, due to a publication protesting the school’s refusal to adopt a BDS policy.

A unique situation of student suppression of faculty speech continues to play out at Goldsmiths College in London. The student government accused David Hirsch, a leading scholar of contemporary antisemitism, of being a “far right white supremacist,” for his expressions of concern over “decolonization of the curriculum.” The students’ characterization of Hirsch as something tantamount to a Nazi was then endorsed by the school’s faculty union, which has long seen him as an unwanted voice. After an initial expression of support for Hirsch, the administration pivoted to state adherence to the “Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism,” which explicitly legitimizes BDS and equations of Israel with Nazism.

Finally, the annual conference of British Methodists voted to renew its support for BDS. Jewish leaders condemned the move. Similarly, the Presbyterian Church, USA (PCUSA) voted to declare Israel an “apartheid state,” to allege that Christians have no freedom of worship in Jerusalem, and to declare May 15 as “Palestinian Nakba Remembrance Day.” Jewish leaders and others condemned the move.

PCUSA’s own statistics show continuing dramatic drops in membership over the last decade, partially as a result of increasingly liberal policies, such as those on gender.

The author is a contributor to SPME, where a version of this article was first published.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.