Tuesday, May 26th | 10 Sivan 5786

Subscribe
July 11, 2025 10:08 am

Francesca Albanese Was Sanctioned Because She Supports Terror — Not Because She Criticizes Israel

×

Error: Contact form not found.

avatar by Channa Rifkin

Opinion

Francesca Albanese, UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, attends a side event during the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, March 26, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

Francecsa Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the “Occupied Palestinian Territories,” is not an international lawyer. She is, however, a biased terror justifier and supporter who denies Israel’s right to self defense. She continuously insists that the West hasn’t done enough to withdraw any kind of support or dealings with Israel, and spouts antisemitic rhetoric, while denying she is antisemitic.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last Wednesday that the United States would finally sanction Albanese for her threat to US interests.

The Western media, however, took that to mean she was sanctioned for her criticism of Israel’s war on Hamas — claiming it was a continuation of the “war” on pro-Palestinian advocates, and an attempt to silence those who “looking into alleged crimes committed by Israel as the war in Gaza continues,” as stated by CNN.

Headlines from the likes of the BBC, CNN, Associated Press (AP), Bloomberg, and beyond downplay who she really is and the real threat she poses.

The source? A wire article from the AP by Farnoush Amiri titled “US issues sanctions against UN investigator probing abuses in Gaza.”

Amiri editorializes, claiming that the US aims to “punish critics” of Israel’s war in Gaza.

For over a year, the media have ignored the violent and antisemitic nature of pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses in the US, and instead, painted these activists as peaceful demonstrators who advocate for equal rights for all people.

From Mahmoud Khalil to Mohsen Mahdawi, these are not just peaceful demonstrators exercising their right to freedom of speech and protest.

In Albanese’s case, she has said numerous times that resistance is acceptable “by any means, including armed struggle,” including at a Hamas conference in Gaza to a room filled with Hamas senior officials.

So no, AP, this is not a campaign to silence criticism of Israel. It is a campaign to combat terror supporters, antisemites and threats to US interests, including Israel. This isn’t a statement on politics, it’s a statement on media transparency.

The Times took things a step further, using Albanese’s past comments to make their point. Reporter George Grylls describes a 2024 interview in which Albanese was asked whether she believed Israel has the right to exist. Her answer? Avoidant.

As for the Telegraph’s take? Well, apparently the evidence she has presented herself over the years isn’t enough. She is merely “accused” of “bias,” and again, sanctioned “over Israel criticism.”

As the media continue to reel from this exceptional move, it’s important to remind the world who Francesca Albanese is and what the US sanction actually stands for, because the media certainly won’t. UN Watch’s Executive Director Hillel Neuer said it best:

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

Algemeiner.com

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Email a copy of to a friend
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.