Monday, July 22nd | 19 Tammuz 5779

July 10, 2016 5:11 am

Israel Tries Area-Based Response to Palestinian Terror Wave

avatar by Yaakov Lappin

Israeli ZAKA volunteers at the scene of a stabbing attack in Hebron. Photo: Courtesy ZAKA.

Israeli ZAKA volunteers at the scene of a stabbing attack in Hebron. Photo: Courtesy ZAKA.

New Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman had the briefest of honeymoon periods after taking up his position at the end of May.

Within a couple of weeks of his appointment, a new surge in Palestinian terrorist attacks began targeting Israeli civilians, placing Lieberman, and the defense establishment he heads, under a new test.

The greater Hebron region in the West Bank quickly emerged as the epicenter from which most of the attacks originated, and Lieberman has begun implementing his security policy, which calls for distinguishing between Palestinian areas.

Under this policy, Israel deploys very firm security measures in areas that generate a lot of terrorism, while easing conditions for Palestinians in areas that do not.

Related coverage

July 22, 2019 8:43 am

Political Detox in the American Sabbath

I am writing this column in McCarthy, Alaska, surrounded by mountains rising almost 20,000 feet and glaciers more than five...

In June, two Palestinian gunmen from the town of Yatta, near Hebron, opened fire on Israeli civilians at a Tel Aviv restaurant, murdering four people. A subsequent investigation revealed that the terrorists, aged 21, acted under the ideological influence of ISIS. A third accomplice was arrested after the attacker told Israeli authorities the cell initially planned to attack a passenger train, before selecting the crowded restaurant in Tel Aviv’s Sarona Market.

Toward the last phase of the Muslim Ramadan holiday in late June — a time that has seen a spike in jihadist attacks on Israelis in recent years — a 17-year-old Palestinian  sneaked into the home of an Israeli family in Kiryat Arba, near Hebron, and stabbed a sleeping 13-year-old to death in her bed, before being shot dead by armed civilians.

A day later, a Palestinian terrorist cell carried out a drive-by shooting on an Israeli family traveling in their vehicle on a West Bank road south of Hebron, shooting dead a father of 10 and inflicting gunshot wounds on the man’s daughter and wife. Later that day, a Palestinian knife attacker from Tul Karem went on a frenzied attack on the streets of the Israeli coastal city of Netanya, seriously injuring a pedestrian before being shot dead by an armed civilian responding to the attack.

At that stage, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) did something it had not done for two years, and placed greater Hebron, a region encompassing 700,000 Palestinians, under closure. Local residents are not permitted to leave the area except for humanitarian purposes.

The last time the IDF took such drastic action was after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hebron Hamas cell in 2014.

Senior military sources said in recent days that the closure is not a form of collective punishment, and should not be viewed as such. Rather, they said, it is a vital tool that creates intelligence leads which can direct security forces to the location of the cell. A failure to capture or kill the cell’s members will result in additional terrorist attacks and more casualties, the sources warned.

This time around, as in 2014, the IDF has increased its personnel in the area, deploying two back-up battalions, and beefing up troop presence on West Bank roads. The Shin Bet domestic intelligence agency leads the hunt for the shooting cell.

There are defense commentators and experts in Israel who believe that Liberman’s policies mark a change from the previous security policy, which was led by Moshe Ya’alon.

Ya’alon called for distinguishing between Palestinian civilians and terrorists everywhere in the West Bank, and he did not advocate a differential, area-based policy.

While Ya’alon sought to provide as many Israeli work permits to Palestinians as was safely possible (after they had been vetted by security forces), Liberman has taken a different approach.

In places like Bani Naim, the village from which the knife attacker who murdered the Israeli girl came, all residents – most of whom are members of the knife attacker’s clan – have had their Israeli work permits revoked.

Liberman believes that only this kind of deterrence stands a chance of quelling a new wave of Palestinian violence. He would not be able to push through such measure alone; Liberman requires the approval of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and a majority in the security cabinet, to be able to make any changes.

However, some defense experts in Israel have taken a wary view of extensive measures that harm the economic conditions of Palestinians, arguing that this approach ultimately can recruit more jihadists.

This is a debate that has raged in Israel in the past, and looks set to continue into the foreseeable future. Yet it is a debate that – while legitimate – deserves to be placed in a wider context.

For the IDF, the mission remains the same, irrespective of who is defense minister. The army must protect roughly 500,000 Israelis who live in the West Bank, amid 2.5 million Palestinians. At the same time, it must work around the clock to prevent lone-wolf terrorists and organized, highly armed cells in the West Bank from terrorizing Israeli cities and flooding them with death and destruction. This is a mission the IDF and Shin Bet carry out with a remarkable degree of success.

The Palestinian jihadists who set out on murder missions target settlers because they form the easiest, closest targets. But if they could, the jihadists would just as willingly cross the Green Line into Israel proper and attempt to butcher civilians in Israeli cities, as the Tel Aviv and Netanya attacks demonstrate.

As senior members of the IDF General Staff point out, terrorism has been afflicting Israelis since the formation of the state – and well before its founding – and no senior defense officials realistically expect any single measure to end attacks for good.

The realistic goal, according to this view, is to come up with the right balance of sticks and carrots that will keep levels of terrorism to a minimum, and to avoid steps that could inflame the atmosphere further.

One of the central pillars of this approach has been the tacit security coordination between the IDF and Palestinian Authority (PA) security forces. The PA, threatened by Hamas, and the prospect of chaos, is serving its own interest by coordinating security with Israel.

And yet, as with so many other aspects of reality in the Middle East, this strategy too is filled with contradictions, since the PA also continues to incite to violence, and senior Palestinian officials, like the governor of Hebron, have even expressed solidarity with the unrepentant relatives of the terrorist who murdered a young teenager in her bed.

The coming weeks and months will reveal whether the latest surge in attacks represents the start of a bigger shift towards confrontation between West Bank Palestinians and Israel, or whether the Israeli defense establishment has been able to, once again, put out the blaze before it turns into an inferno.

Yaakov Lappin is the Jerusalem Post’s military and national security affairs correspondent, and author of The Virtual Caliphate (Potomac Books, 2011), which proposes that jihadis on the internet established a virtual Islamist state and sought to upload it in failed states. The book was published four years before ISIS declared a caliphate.

The opinions presented by Algemeiner bloggers are solely theirs and do not represent those of The Algemeiner, its publishers or editors. If you would like to share your views with a blog post on The Algemeiner, please be in touch through our Contact page.

Share this Story: Share On Facebook Share On Twitter

Let your voice be heard!

Join the Algemeiner

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.