Armed Palestinian carry one of the four coffins during the handover of the bodies of four Israeli hostages to the Red Cross in Khan Yunis. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/dpa via Reuters Connect

“Hamas tones the theatrics down a notch at the latest hostage release” is the online headline over an item published by the New York Times.

The headline appears over a photograph that renders the words ridiculous. The picture features five gun-brandishing fighters costumed in military vests, camouflage uniforms, black facemasks, red-and-white Italian-restaurant-tablecloth-style checked keffiyehs, and green Hamas headbands. Behind them is a tightly packed audience of mostly young and male spectators. There’s no need for such a show of force in connection with a hostage release; the point is for Hamas propaganda to make it appear that, rather than being nearly vanquished, the terrorist organization still exists as a strong, organized, well-equipped fighting force.

What kind of warped editorial mind surveys a scene that grotesque and makes the judgement that the news to be emphasized is that the theatrics have been toned down?

The item was a product of the Times “live” desk that provides continuously updated coverage of breaking news events for the Times website. It carries the bylines of Aaron Boxerman and Saher Alghorra. Alghorra is also credited with taking the photograph in Khan Younis, Gaza. Perhaps he has a reasonable fear that if the headline said, “Hamas turns hostage turnover into a cruel circus,” the gunmen from the terrorist organization would make him their next target. The Times itself has previously conceded that “Hamas restricts journalists in Gaza,” making it reasonable for readers to wonder what restrictions Alghorra was subject to in his photographing and reporting.

“Live” coverage gives readers more speed, but in this case, it seems to have come at the expense of thoughtful judgment and editorial standards. The real story isn’t that Hamas has “toned down” the theatrics from some previously absurd level. The real story is that the hostage releases are being accompanied by such violent public spectacles in the first place.

The media watchdog group Honest Reporting was having none of it. Honest Reporting posted to social media: “Actually, @nytimes, parading tortured, terrified hostages on stage isn’t ‘theatrics,’ and it sure wasn’t ‘toned down.’ It was even worse — Hamas doubled down on the humiliation with sick ‘personalized gifts’ like an hourglass taunting a hostage’s mother.”

It is a challenge when covering a horrible terrorist organization to maintain perspective. And I guess in some theoretical journalism class sort of way one can debate whether the proper bar of comparison is such a group’s previous atrocious behavior or normal, non-terrorist behavior. Yet a headline like “tones the theatrics down a notch,” is an example of what George W. Bush used to call the soft bigotry of low expectations. Rather than asking why Hamas took Israeli civilian hostages in the first place, and why it has taken so long for Hamas to release them, and why the releases are being accompanied by displays of military force, the Times headline-writer chooses to focus on the appearance of this hostage release being slightly less barbaric than the previous one.

It appears as if the Times headline is celebrating some sort of newfound praiseworthy civility or improved behavior by Hamas. That’s grossly inappropriate, under the circumstances.

I’ve been skeptical in the past of the practice of dunking on Times online headlines that are later revised for print, and in this case, the print editors had the better judgment to avoid using in print the headline that appeared to be almost praising Hamas for toning down the theatrics. Yet at a certain point, there have been enough bad online breaking news headlines that it’s become a pattern. If the Times placed a higher priority on its reputation and credibility, it’d tone its own carelessness down a notch.

Ira Stoll was managing editor of The Forward and North American editor of The Jerusalem Post. His media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.